2022
DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/ac954f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing HD-EEG functional connectivity states using a human brain computational model

Abstract: Objective. Electro/Magnetoencephalography (EEG/MEG) source-space network analysis is increasingly recognized as a powerful tool for tracking fast electrophysiological brain dynamics. However, an objective and quantitative evaluation of pipeline steps is challenging due to the lack of realistic ‘controlled’ data. Here, our aim is two-folded: 1) provide a quantitative assessment of the advantages and limitations of the analyzed techniques and 2) introduce (and share) a complete framework that can be used to opti… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the task is more complex and brain networks often change states rapidly, we analyzed dynamic networks using a sliding window approach for the memory task. Overall, our results show that both PCA and DMD approaches successfully extracted dominant connectivity configurations and their respective time dynamics on the simulated and the real MEG data when compared with the results of previous works that used the same dataset [15,42]. Simulated data results that were reported in the supplementary material showed how network configurations shifted across time and were comparative with the ground truth.…”
Section: Discussion and Future Worksupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Since the task is more complex and brain networks often change states rapidly, we analyzed dynamic networks using a sliding window approach for the memory task. Overall, our results show that both PCA and DMD approaches successfully extracted dominant connectivity configurations and their respective time dynamics on the simulated and the real MEG data when compared with the results of previous works that used the same dataset [15,42]. Simulated data results that were reported in the supplementary material showed how network configurations shifted across time and were comparative with the ground truth.…”
Section: Discussion and Future Worksupporting
confidence: 55%
“…The COALIA model ( Bensaid et al., 2019 ), for example, has been used to mimick network activity in epilepsy for the purpose of validating FC estimates ( Allouch et al., 2022 ). Further studies used the same model family to study the effect of parameters such as electrode density on FC estimates ( Allouch, Kabbara, Duprez, Khalil, Modolo, Hassan, 2023 , Tabbal, Kabbara, Yochum, Khalil, Hassan, Benquet, 2022 ). Similarly, Jirsa and Müller (2013) have used TVB to evaluate metrics of cross-frequency coupling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%