2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0895-4356(01)00426-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing health-related quality of life following myocardial infarctionIs the SF-12 useful?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
1
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
32
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the general population, where the mean and standard deviation of the SF-12 are 50 and 10, respectively, this translates to a difference of 5 units [42] . A second metric uses a standardized mean response (SMR), calculated as the mean difference divided by the SD of the mean, to assess the clinical importance of a HRQoL score change [43] . An SMR between 0.2 and 0.49 characterizes a small, 0.5-0.79, a moderate, and 0.8 and above a large change in QoL.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the general population, where the mean and standard deviation of the SF-12 are 50 and 10, respectively, this translates to a difference of 5 units [42] . A second metric uses a standardized mean response (SMR), calculated as the mean difference divided by the SD of the mean, to assess the clinical importance of a HRQoL score change [43] . An SMR between 0.2 and 0.49 characterizes a small, 0.5-0.79, a moderate, and 0.8 and above a large change in QoL.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A criticism of the SF-12 is that it allows only the calculations of the summary scales but not of the subscales. The summary scales may conceal important information contained in the subscales of the SF-36 [Rubenach et al, 2002]. Investigators must trade off between the additional information of the subscales and longer questionnaires or interviews.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is no consensus on which is the most appropriate index. We chose the SRM as it is one of the most commonly used indices of responsiveness and takes the variation of change into account [23][24][25] . The SRM is calculated by dividing the mean change in scores by the standard deviation of change.…”
Section: Responsiveness To Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of studies have investigated responsiveness to change of the SF-12 in other diseases than cerebrovascular disease such as rheumatoid arthritis [24] , epilepsy [25] , low back pain [29] or coronary heart disease [23,30] . Responsiveness to change of the SF-12 summary scales was small to moderate in most studies [23][24][25]30] . Responsiveness to change was similar [25,29,30] or slightly reduced [24] when comparing the SF-12 to the SF-36 summary scales.…”
Section: Mcs-12mentioning
confidence: 99%