2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.03.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing incentive policies for integrating centralized solar power generation in the Brazilian electric power system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
26
0
6

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
26
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…per year. In the 2d scenario, the three CSP configurations enter the energy system with LCOE ranging from 0.11 $2010/kWh to 0.15 $2010/kWh which is comparable to the findings of [6] and [7].…”
Section: -4supporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…per year. In the 2d scenario, the three CSP configurations enter the energy system with LCOE ranging from 0.11 $2010/kWh to 0.15 $2010/kWh which is comparable to the findings of [6] and [7].…”
Section: -4supporting
confidence: 74%
“…Malagueta et al used an energy system model for Brazil and found that levelized costs of electricity (LCOE) of CSP vary between 0.19 $/kWh and 0.31 $/kWh depending on the location of the plant and whether it is hybridized or uses thermal energy storage [6]. In comparison to a base case, CSP leads to significantly higher system costs but the authors argue that these can be justified since CSP could provide employment and social benefits in the poorer areas of Brazil.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, it is worth evaluating the possibilities of hybridizing biomass and solar energy, especially in Brazil. Studies such as [6][7][8], showed that Bom Jesus da Lapa (BJL) is a proper site in Brazilian semiarid region for a CSP power plant. Nevertheless, Brazil has several other places which are suitable for CSP power plants as described by [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BIPV could be adopted as a cost effective measure for residential housing energy production if the payback period for the investment on a time scale is less than the lifecycle of the system and within certain measures (such as a subsidy or feed-in-tariff), households would be able to adopt BIPV systems [22]. Over the years, there have been a number of studies conducted to find out people's perceptions about BIPV [23][24][25][26]. Nevertheless, there is a need for more detailed investigations into the integration of solar systems/technology as a component of the whole building composition at the design stage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%