Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Applied Science and Technology on Engineering Science 2021
DOI: 10.5220/0010950000003260
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing Individual Fitness for Research and Development Position using Fuzzy AHP and Pareto: Case Study in Manufacturing Industry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The criteria for evaluating prospective workers in the R&D field were generated from previous research (Ronyastra et al 2021) and adjusted to the R&D conditions at PT ABC, as listed in Table 1. As seen in this table, we categorized the criteria into three groups: objective, subjective, and absolute.…”
Section: Criteria Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The criteria for evaluating prospective workers in the R&D field were generated from previous research (Ronyastra et al 2021) and adjusted to the R&D conditions at PT ABC, as listed in Table 1. As seen in this table, we categorized the criteria into three groups: objective, subjective, and absolute.…”
Section: Criteria Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous studies have examined competency mismatches from a variety of perspectives, including those of job-seekers, employees, and employers as well as the impact of mismatches on employees' pay (Van der Velden and Bijlsma 2019) and employee self-evaluation (Pellizzari and Fichen 2017). In addition, this selfevaluation mismatch has been studied in a variety of professional domains, such as banking services (Setiawan et al 2021), quality control in production and manufacturing (Herowati et al 2021), as well as research and development (Ronyastra et al 2021). All of these studies measured how companies were chosen by job-seekers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%