2017
DOI: 10.3389/fmats.2017.00034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing Local Structure Motifs Using Order Parameters for Motif Recognition, Interstitial Identification, and Diffusion Path Characterization

Abstract: Structure-property relationships form the basis of many design rules in materials science, including synthesizability and long-term stability of catalysts, control of electrical and optoelectronic behavior in semiconductors, as well as the capacity of and transport properties in cathode materials for rechargeable batteries. The immediate atomic environments (i.e., the first coordination shells) of a few atomic sites are often a key factor in achieving a desired property. Some of the most frequently encountered… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
85
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
1
85
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Identify or construct a dataset of MOF crystal structures to study. Tools such as Pymatgen and Zeo++ can be used to select MOFs with specific metals, coordination environments, and pore sizes relevant to the given reaction of interest. Using DFT, optimize the unit cell volume, unit cell shape, and internal degrees of freedom (i.e., atomic positions) for each MOF. Starting from the optimized MOF structures, initialize the positions of atomic and molecular adsorbates required to predict catalytic activity via (1). Using DFT, relax the atomic positions of the structures generated via (4). Compute the catalytic descriptors of interest to rank MOF candidates. For promising MOF candidates, generate the potential energy diagram for the proposed mechanism and perform detailed electronic structure analyses to better understand the reaction kinetics.…”
Section: General Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Identify or construct a dataset of MOF crystal structures to study. Tools such as Pymatgen and Zeo++ can be used to select MOFs with specific metals, coordination environments, and pore sizes relevant to the given reaction of interest. Using DFT, optimize the unit cell volume, unit cell shape, and internal degrees of freedom (i.e., atomic positions) for each MOF. Starting from the optimized MOF structures, initialize the positions of atomic and molecular adsorbates required to predict catalytic activity via (1). Using DFT, relax the atomic positions of the structures generated via (4). Compute the catalytic descriptors of interest to rank MOF candidates. For promising MOF candidates, generate the potential energy diagram for the proposed mechanism and perform detailed electronic structure analyses to better understand the reaction kinetics.…”
Section: General Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…PyCDT uses an effective and easily extendable approach for interstitial site finding (Interstitial Finding Tool: In-FiT) that has been recently introduced by Zimmermann et al [36]. The procedure systematically searches for tentative interstitial sites by employing coordination pattern-recognition capabilities [67,68] implemented in pymatgen [3].…”
Section: Interstitialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to PyCDT and pymatgen, we utilized phonopy [36], and VESTA [37] for generating inputs to DFT calculations, post-processing, and plotting the DFT calculations results. The order-parameter based interstitial finding algorithm introduced by Zimmerman et al [28] identified five potential interstitial sites and their positions are shown in Figure 1. Among the potential interstitial sites, three are tetrahedral sites and the remaining two are octahedral sites, which are defined by their coordination numbers as well as the coordinating elements.…”
Section: Density Functional Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%