2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.trac.2019.115670
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing microbial water quality: Electroanalytical approaches to the detection of coliforms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the obligate anaerobes and host-specific viruses proposed as alternative indicators for MST are often not amenable to laboratory culture [43]. A range of alternative detection methods continue to be developed and are the subject of several recent comprehensive reviews [97,[128][129][130][131], with real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) and related molecular methods that infer the presence of fecal microbes from their genetic material experiencing particularly widespread adoption [43].…”
Section: Molecular Methods: Challenges and Advancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the obligate anaerobes and host-specific viruses proposed as alternative indicators for MST are often not amenable to laboratory culture [43]. A range of alternative detection methods continue to be developed and are the subject of several recent comprehensive reviews [97,[128][129][130][131], with real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) and related molecular methods that infer the presence of fecal microbes from their genetic material experiencing particularly widespread adoption [43].…”
Section: Molecular Methods: Challenges and Advancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The growing and mandatory need for real-time on-site tracking of quality of water and the environment necessitates an alternative reliable and sensitive technique which is affordable and exerts less pressure on the environment [ 27 ]. The electrochemical monitoring technique has emerged that promising platform for handy, affordable substitute with high selectivity and a low limit of detection [ 28 , 29 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5] For the detection of E. coli , traditional plate counting method is reliable but labor-intensive and time-consuming. [6] In order to meet the growing demand for sensitive and rapid bacteria detection, various technologies have been developed, such as enzyme-linked immune sorbent assay, [7] polymerase chain reaction, [8] cell counting via flow cytometry, [9] quartz crystal microbalance, [10] nanosensor [11] and so on. While these detection methods are accurate and sensitive, each technique still has its own limitations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%