Assessing personality in San Joaquin kit fox in situ: efficacy of field-based experimental methods and implications for conservation management

Abstract

Utilisation of animal personality has potential benefit for conservation management. Due to logistics of robust behavioural evaluation in situ, the majority of studies on wild animals involve taking animals into captivity for testing, potentially compromising results. Three in situ tests for evaluation of boldness in San Joaquin kit fox (Vulpes macrotis mutica) were developed (ENOT: extended novel object test; RNOT: rapid novel object test; TH: trap/handling test). Each test successfully identified variation in boldness within its target age class(es). The TH test was suitable for use across all age classes. Tests were assessed for in situ suitability and for quantity/quality of data yielded. ENOT was rated as requiring high levels of time, cost and labour with greater likelihood of failure. However, it was rated highly for data quantity/quality. The TH test was rated as requiring little time, labour and cost, but yielding lower quality data. RNOT was rated in the middle. Each test had merit and could be adapted to suit project or species constraints. We recommend field-based evaluation of personality, reducing removal of animals from the wild and facilitating routine incorporation of personality assessment into conservation projects.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10164-017-0525-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Animal Personality and Conservation: Basics for Inspiring New Research

“…The scores for each bold/shy category are summed, and the highest values represent the bolder individuals while the lowest values represent the shyer individuals. This method developed for the swift fox proved to be easy to apply and should be considered in conservation programs (this is only a suggestion; other practices can be found in the scientific literature [ 127 , 143 ]). Obviously, it would be useful to have population data because of the possibility of having only one personality type in your sample.…”

The Personality Panorama: Conceptualizing Personality through Big Behavioural Data

“…The history of psychology is steeped in discussions that turn a critical gaze towards our ethics, pushing us to consider what our ethics do—and should —look like (e.g. Brierley, 1920; Coxe, 1940; Gluck, 1997; Krasner, 1962; Marks, 2018; Meerloo, 1956; Powell, Digdon, Harris, & Smithson, 2014; Prilleltensky, 1989; Seligman, 2018; Zimbardo, 1973). In the widespread discussion on ethics and big data, there is, of course, the recognized potential for societal benefits in the new age of personality measurement.…”

“…Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, West, Jurafsky, Leskovec, & Potts, 2013;Goldberg, Manian, Monroe, Potts, & Srivastava, 2015). In many ways, the study of humans through such in situ behaviours is no different than how we have come to understand personality in other species (Bremner-Harrison, Cypher, Van Horn Job, & Harrison, 2018;Briffa & Greenaway, 2011;Tkaczynski et al, 2018). By accounting for the context in which human behaviour occurs, we expand our scope of understanding the past, present, and future of personality at every level (Krause, James, & Croft, 2010).…”

Successful predatory‐avoidance behaviour to lion auditory cues during soft‐release from captivity in cheetah

“…Therefore, it is necessary to closely monitor candidates for translocation both pre-and post-reintroduction to ensure that they are not only suitable candidates (Canessa et al, 2016;Kongsurakan et al, 2020;Rozhnov et al, 2011) but are also capable of thriving in these new habitats (Berger-Tal & Saltz, 2014;Blumstein et al, 2019). Despite being largely overlooked by the ecological rewilding community, animal behaviour may yet play a key role in conservation at the level of individually optimised success and sitespecific tailoring for reintroductions (Bremner-Harrison et al, 2018;Merrick & Koprowski, 2017).…”