Assessing production and operations management related journals: the European perspective

Soteriou, Andreas C.; Hadjinicola, George C.; Patsia, Kalia

doi:10.1016/s0272-6963(98)00040-0

Cited by 62 publications

(68 citation statements)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…They have grown in popularity over the past 10 years, as academics themselves have sought to develop rating and ranking systems as an alternative to lists produced by external agencies. Peer assessment has been used in operations management (Soteriou, Hadjinicola, & Patsia, 1999), MIS (Mylonopoulos & Theoharakis, 2001), construction management (Wing, 1997), international business (Dubois & Reeb, 2000), and tourism and hospitality (Hsu & Yeung, 2003;Pechlaner, Zehrer, Matzler, & Abfalter, 2004;Schmidgall, Woods, & Rutherford, 1996;Sheldon, 1990). The large amount of interest from the tourism community reflects a collective frustration at both having to justify the academic credibility of tourism as a field of study and the failure of other rating systems to include a sufficiently large sample of journals.…”

Section: Peer Assessmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Rating tourism and hospitality journals

2006

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Peer Assessmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Rating tourism and hospitality journals

2006

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Studies by Vokurka [34] and Goh et al [12] used objective citation indices measures to classify POM-related journals. Soteriou et al [31] classified POM-related journals in terms of their quality and relevance based on the perceptions of European POM researchers. Barman et al [3] report that the quality and relevance of POM journals, as perceived by US academics, remained constant when compared with the perceptual findings of the Barman et al [4] study, and further comments on the differences between European and US academics, as identified by Soteriou et al [31].…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Factors affecting research productivity of production and operations management groups: An empirical study

Hadjinicola

Soteriou

2006

Journal of Applied Mathematics and Decision Sciences

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper identifies factors that promote research productivity of production and operations management (POM) groups of researchers in US business schools. In this study, research productivity of a POM group is defined as the number of articles published per POM professor in a specific period of time. The paper also examines factors that affect research quality, as measured by the number of articles published per POM professor in journals, which have been recognized in the POM literature as an elite set. The results show that three factors increase both the research productivity and the quality of the articles published by professors of a POM group. These factors are (a) the presence of a POM research center, (b) funding received from external sources for research purposes, and (c) better library facilities. Doctoral students do assist in improving research quality and productivity, but they are not the driving force. These results have important implications for establishing policy guidelines for business schools. For example, real-world problems are funded by external sources and have a higher probability of publication. Furthermore, schools could place more emphasis on external funding, as most engineering schools do, since groups receiving external funding are more productive in terms of research.

show abstract

“…Perception-based studies involve consultations with researchers in the field of interest regarding a set of journals based on criteria such as the quality and relevance of these journals [41]. In total, seven perception-based studies were analyzed [42][43][44][45][46][47][48].…”

Section: Methodological Proceduresmentioning

confidence: 99%

Modularization strategy: analysis of published articles on production and operations management (1999 to 2013)

Piran

Lacerda

Antunes

et al. 2015

Int J Adv Manuf Technol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The objective of this study was to analyze the main topics studied on the subject of modularization in 81 academic articles published between 1999 and 2013 in international and Brazilian journals that include research related to production and operations management. This analysis proposes a general framework of studies that serves as support for future research on modularization strategy. To fulfill the proposed objective, a systematic literature review was conducted using 10 international academic journals and two Brazilian academic journals that publish studies on the study topic. The main results include identifying the lack of studies on the background that leads to modularization, the lack of empirical and quantitative studies on its effects, and the use of modularization in the organizational, service, and environmental contexts. The present study also organizes modularization studies in the proposed conceptual structure and classifies the articles analyzed into a specific modularization taxonomy and in terms of the study's objective.Keywords Modularity . Modularization . Modular . Module . Modularity in design . Modularity in production . Modularity in use . Organizational modularity . Modularity in services

show abstract

Assessing production and operations management related journals: the European perspective

Cited by 62 publications

References 16 publications

Rating tourism and hospitality journals

Rating tourism and hospitality journals

Factors affecting research productivity of production and operations management groups: An empirical study

Modularization strategy: analysis of published articles on production and operations management (1999 to 2013)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About