2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00742.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing quality of a worksite health promotion programme from participants’ views: findings from a qualitative study in Malaysia

Abstract: Background An assessment of the process and outcomes of a health promotion programme is necessary for the continuous improvement of a programme.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The implications of the findings from the current study align with recommendations from the WHO report, which suggest employment opportunities and workplaces that promote and protect mental health through organizational policies and practices are a priority for action to improve the resilience of the dementia care workforce internationally. Future research may focus on workplace settings that addresses the acceptability and feasibility of stress and coping intervention programmes for dementia care employees.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The implications of the findings from the current study align with recommendations from the WHO report, which suggest employment opportunities and workplaces that promote and protect mental health through organizational policies and practices are a priority for action to improve the resilience of the dementia care workforce internationally. Future research may focus on workplace settings that addresses the acceptability and feasibility of stress and coping intervention programmes for dementia care employees.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Liau et al used a qualitative method to assess the quality and effectiveness of a work site health promotion intervention targeting cardiovascular risk factors such as smoking, obesity, physical inactivity and unhealthy diet. 37 By using findings from the follow up qualitative inquiry, researchers gained a deeper insight into the ways to improve the intervention that is otherwise unable to be captured from the quantitative arm. An important assertion that needs to be made here is that neither of these designs is implying superiority or inadequacy of either qualitative or quantitative methodology but rather to focus on how to make complementary uses of both methods to fill out, complete or extend the information.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ten studies employed cross-sectional study methods for monitoring the implementation of WHP programs and assessing the outputs of the interventions. Among them, one study employed the qualitative study method (Liau et al, 2014) and seven others employed mixed-method studies (Abdullah, 2003;Daud, 2003;Hope, 2003;Manothum and Rukijkanpanich, 2010;WPRO, 2001;Yusoff, 2003;Zainuddin, 2003), which provided more insights about the factors related to the effectiveness of WHP intervention.…”
Section: Characteristics Of the Literature Included In The Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%