2013
DOI: 10.2166/washdev.2013.061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing reported use and microbiological performance of a point-of-use household water filter in rural Fiji

Abstract: A non-governmental organisation has distributed point-of-use water filtering units in the Western Division of Fiji. We sought to understand filter utilisation and water quality: both water flowing directly out of filters and stored water. We surveyed 270 households and 6 schools on filter use and performed hydrogen sulphide bacterial indicator testing on 24 water samples directly from filters and 37 stored water samples. Our response rate was 95%. Of these, only half (52%) reported consistently filtering their… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Only one respondent believed drinking from her DRWH system had caused an illness in the past. Questions regarding how water affects health in general were not asked in this study, but a previous survey of rural households in Fiji found that most respondents identified a link between health and drinking dirty water, and believed that diarrhoea is a potentially fatal symptom (Kohlitz et al 2013 …”
Section: Household Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only one respondent believed drinking from her DRWH system had caused an illness in the past. Questions regarding how water affects health in general were not asked in this study, but a previous survey of rural households in Fiji found that most respondents identified a link between health and drinking dirty water, and believed that diarrhoea is a potentially fatal symptom (Kohlitz et al 2013 …”
Section: Household Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over a 3-month period, a significant decrease in diarrhea prevalence for children under the age of 5 was recorded when comparing the filter arm or the combination of the filter and training on WASH to the control arm [11]. However, a study of Sawyer® PointONE™ filters that had been distributed in Fiji 1 to 3 years prior to the study identified bacterial contamination in 17 out of 24 samples taken directly from filters and 28 out of 37 samples taken from stored filtered water as determined by sulfide paper testing [12]. Also, the study noted in an accompanying survey that only 30% of participants used the filter every time they drank water, and broken filters were observed in 22% of surveyed households [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a study of Sawyer® PointONE™ filters that had been distributed in Fiji 1 to 3 years prior to the study identified bacterial contamination in 17 out of 24 samples taken directly from filters and 28 out of 37 samples taken from stored filtered water as determined by sulfide paper testing [12]. Also, the study noted in an accompanying survey that only 30% of participants used the filter every time they drank water, and broken filters were observed in 22% of surveyed households [12]. Another study evaluated six Sawyer® PointONE™ filters that had been used for 23 months in Honduras.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results from water sample testing confirm that bacteria were prevalent in water samples, including genera that are known to contain pathogens associated with waterborne disease. Limited amounts of dissolved metals and metal-containing particulates were observed in the drinking water sources.While previous research[13][14][15]17] yielded mixed results from the Sawyer ® PointONE ™ filter system in laboratory testing and field environments, our randomized, controlled field trial provides additional evidence of their effectiveness in reducing waterborne disease out to at least 200 days post-installation in real world settings. The hollow fiber membrane technology is designed to remove bacteria and particulates, but not dissolved ions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 82%