Assessing researchers’ capabilities, opportunities, and motivation to conduct equity-oriented dissemination and implementation research, an exploratory cross-sectional study

Abstract

Background A recent paradigm shift has led to an explicit focus on enhancing health equity through equity-oriented dissemination and implementation (D&I) research. However, the integration and bidirectional learning across these two fields is still in its infancy and siloed. This exploratory study aimed to examine participants’ perceived capabilities, opportunities, and motivations to conduct equity-oriented D&I research. Methods We conducted an exploratory cross-sectional survey distributed online from December 2020 to April 2021. Participants were recruited at either D&I or health disparities-oriented conferences, meetings, through social media, or personal outreach via emails. Informed by the Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation Model (COM-B), the survey queried respondents about different aspects of engaging in and conducting equity-oriented D&I research. All analyses were conducted in SPSS Version 27.0. Results A total of 180 participants responded to the survey. Most participants were women (81.7%), white (66.1%), academics (78.9%), and faculty members (53.9%). Many reported they were advanced (36.7%) or advanced beginners (27.8%) in the D&I field, and a substantial proportion (37.8%) reported being novice in D&I research that focused on health equity. Participants reported high motivation (e.g., 62.8% were motivated to apply theories, models, frameworks for promoting health equity in D&I research), but low capability to conduct equity-oriented D&I research (e.g., 5% had the information needed for promoting health equity in D&I research). Most participants (62.2%) reported not having used measures to examine equity in their D&I projects, and for those who did use measures, they mainly used individual-level measures (vs. organizational- or structural-level measures). When asked about factors that could influence their ability to conduct equity-oriented D&I research, 44.4% reported not having the skills necessary, and 32.2% stated difficulties in receiving funding for equity-oriented D&I research. Conclusions Study findings provide empirical insight into the perspectives of researchers from different backgrounds on what is needed to conduct equity-oriented D&I research. These data suggest the need for a multi-pronged approach to enhance the capability and opportunities for conducting equity-oriented D&I work, such as: training specifically in equity-oriented D&I, collaboration between D&I researchers with individuals with expertise and lived experience with health equity research, funding for equity-oriented D&I research, and recognition of the value of community engaged research in promotion packages.

Grounding implementation science in health equity for cancer prevention and control

“…Although there has been an increase (up to 55% in 2018) of implementation scientists engaging with stakeholders, there continues to be a lack of specificity around the methods of engagement and a misalignment with academic priorities of tenure and promotion [ 84 , 85 ]. Determining the required competencies for researchers focused on health equity may serve as important next steps [ 86 ], with a specific focus on IS [ 87 ]; further, evaluating perceptions of researchers working at the intersection of health equity and IS might allow for a comprehensive understanding of the motivations and barriers to proposing and conducting equity-oriented IS. Efforts at the national level [ 88 ] are needed to provide career development opportunities that prioritize recruitment and retention of scholars from under-represented groups and support scholars conducting or interested in learning how to conduct equity-oriented research.…”

Perspectives on learning to practice reflexivity while engaging communities in implementation science

“…As we consider necessary skills for dissemination and implementation science and practice committed to health equity (24), reflexivity might be considered a core element based on fields of anthropology, sociology, and others deeply embedded in understanding communities and knowledge production (11). It would be interesting to observe which actionable methods to practice reflexivity other implementation scientists or practitioners find useful, and report these in publications.…”

Identifying research practices toward achieving health equity principles within the Cancer Prevention and Control Research Network

“…This gap is further exacerbated in the unprecedented number of investigators that have shifted their attention toward health equity, often lacking previous experience, necessary skills, or sustained commitment to communities experiencing disparities. Referred to as "health equity tourism" by Lett and colleagues, such a deficit in skills and commitment can lead to unintended consequence of causing more harm than benefit to the communities [9]. To engage in health equity-oriented research, investigators must shift from traditional research methods to a paradigm that incorporates equitable practices and processes within research collaborations.…”