1996
DOI: 10.1006/mvre.1996.0014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing Retinal Neovascularization in an Animal Model of Proliferative Retinopathy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To determine the effect of the various treatments on angiogenesis, the extent of retinal neovascularization was assessed in flattened retinas stained for ADPase activity. 19 Images of ADPase-stained retinas were digitized, captured, and displayed at 65ϫ magnification. Vessel tufts were then outlined directly on the monitor face with an interactive stylus pen (FTG Data Systems, Stanton, CA).…”
Section: Retinal Angiogenesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To determine the effect of the various treatments on angiogenesis, the extent of retinal neovascularization was assessed in flattened retinas stained for ADPase activity. 19 Images of ADPase-stained retinas were digitized, captured, and displayed at 65ϫ magnification. Vessel tufts were then outlined directly on the monitor face with an interactive stylus pen (FTG Data Systems, Stanton, CA).…”
Section: Retinal Angiogenesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1b). However, these sorts of images do not lend themselves readily to a quantitative analysis of NV, and are subject to several preparation artifacts (38). Therefore, an independent and more quantifiable additional analysis of the treatment groups was performed.…”
Section: Assessment Of Antineovascular Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore very similar results were obtained with single masked observers or using a median score for all three masked observers. Fluorescein perfusion and ADPase staining were performed on the same individual retinae as described by Penn and Henry (20) (Figs. 1 and 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%