2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2017.10.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing stakeholder's experience and sensitivity on key issues for the economic growth of organic aquaculture production

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Organic fish culture intends to defend fish from injury, environmental hazards, parasite infestations, and disease outbreaks through low stocking of fish, with resulting benefits on animal welfare, but also on maintaining and enhancing water quality (Censkowsky and Altena 2013;Bergleiter and Meisch 2015). Low stocking density is considered suitable because of its implications for fish welfare, which also favor the maintenance of good water quality (Lembo et al 2018). It has been shown that maintaining fish welfare in organic aquaculture is possible, through regular monitoring (Seibel et al 2018).…”
Section: Environmental Benefitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Organic fish culture intends to defend fish from injury, environmental hazards, parasite infestations, and disease outbreaks through low stocking of fish, with resulting benefits on animal welfare, but also on maintaining and enhancing water quality (Censkowsky and Altena 2013;Bergleiter and Meisch 2015). Low stocking density is considered suitable because of its implications for fish welfare, which also favor the maintenance of good water quality (Lembo et al 2018). It has been shown that maintaining fish welfare in organic aquaculture is possible, through regular monitoring (Seibel et al 2018).…”
Section: Environmental Benefitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The appearance of organic fish culture is related to rising widespread concerns about consumer acceptance, food safety and quality, eco-labeling, animal welfare, and minimizing environmental hazards (Aarset et al 2004;Cottee and Petersan 2009;Censkowsky and Altena 2013;Xie et al 2013;Lembo and Mente 2019). The experience, knowledge, and preferences of stakeholders on these key issues must be considered for the further development of organic aquaculture (Lembo et al 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…-In contrast, many consumers and producers prefer other strategies related to the environment surrounding aquaculture farms. Lembo et al (2018) showed that in order to minimize the environmental impact of aquaculture, stakeholders placed the highest value on the prevention of chemical waste, namely nitrogen and phosphorus, and on the increase of feed efficiency in terms of fish meal and oil used. -Along these lines, prior to the arrival to the farm, feed production has also an environmental impact that is commonly measured by the energy use (MJ equiv.…”
Section: Proposed Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Organic aquaculture is a fairly young sector of food production (Lembo et al, 2018). The earliest standard was established in 1994 in Austria for common carp ( Cyprinus carpio ) (Bergleiter, Berner, Censkowsky, & Guliá‐Camprodon, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The negative effects of fish farming could be mainly reduced by improving feeding practices: feed delivery control to minimize feed wastage. This could also be achieved by the extensive development and implementation of new practices in the aquaculture sector, such as the use of deposit feeder organisms in integrated multi‐trophic aquaculture (IMTA) systems (Neofitou, Lolas, et al, 2019; Tolon, Emiroglu, Gunay, & Ozgul, 2017) or the growth of organic aquaculture production (Lembo, Jokumsen, Spedicato, Facchini, & Bitteto, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%