2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2011.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing state substance abuse prevention infrastructure through the lens of CSAP's Strategic Prevention Framework

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One factor that may contribute to the modest number of studies examining behavioral outcomes is that process measures are more readily available across local and state prevention systems, whereas behavioral outcome data may be limited (e.g., Orwin et al, 2014; Piper et al, 2012). Our findings suggest that SPF implementation may support coalitions in facilitating community changes, which may contribute to some modest improvements in binge drinking and enforcement-related outcomes over time.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One factor that may contribute to the modest number of studies examining behavioral outcomes is that process measures are more readily available across local and state prevention systems, whereas behavioral outcome data may be limited (e.g., Orwin et al, 2014; Piper et al, 2012). Our findings suggest that SPF implementation may support coalitions in facilitating community changes, which may contribute to some modest improvements in binge drinking and enforcement-related outcomes over time.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rather, several studies have been published on enhancing coalition capacity and infrastructure to support SPF implementation (e.g., Anderson-Carpenter, Watson-Thompson, Jones, & Chaney, 2014; Florin et al, 2012; Orwin, Stein-Seroussi, Edwards, Landy, & Flewelling, 2014). Although studies have described process measures used in SPF implementation (e.g., Florin et al, 2012; Piper et al, 2012), few published studies have examined its effects on changes in substance use outcomes and related influencing factors. Thus, the purpose of this multi-site study is to examine the effects of implementing the SPF on binge drinking and enforcement of existing underage drinking laws across multiple school districts.…”
Section: Strategic Prevention Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prevention coalitions in five rural counties that were part of the Center for Substance Abuse Prevention‐funded Tennessee Strategic Prevention Framework State Incentive Grant (SPF‐SIG) volunteered to implement the sustainability strategy being presented during the fifth year of the 6‐year grant that included a no‐cost extension (Collins, Johnson, & White, ). The SPF‐SIG grant program was launched by Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration/Center for Substance Abuse Prevention to provide a framework for strengthening state‐level and community‐level substance abuse prevention systems and to implement evidence‐based prevention programs and practices in communities to reduce substance abuse and related problems (Piper, Stein‐Seroussi, Flewelling, Orwin, & Buchanan, ). This grant program required states and communities to use a five‐stage SPF intervention that involved assessment, capacity‐building, planning, implementation, and evaluation, as well as two cross‐cutting elements, cultural competence, and sustainability.…”
Section: Pilot Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These inefficiencies can be addressed to improve the composition of local behavioral health care systems. Assessing the local system requires both a framework for defining an adequate care system and a method for estimating demand for each component of the system to address the behavioral health care needs of the community population (10). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%