2015
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2639178
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing Systemic Risk Due to Fire Sales Spillover Through Maximum Entropy Network Reconstruction

Abstract: Assessing systemic risk in financial markets is of great importance but it often requires data that are unavailable or available at a very low frequency. For this reason, systemic risk assessment with partial information is potentially very useful for regulators and other stakeholders. In this paper we consider systemic risk due to fire sales spillover and portfolio rebalancing by using the risk metrics defined by Greenwood et al. (2015). By using the Maximum Entropy principle we propose a method to assess agg… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
57
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
0
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main characteristic of MaxEntropy is that it generates fully connected networks, i.e., it assumes maximum diversification. Di Gangi et al (2015) show that, in the case of bipartite networks, MaxEntropy implies that all market participants hold the exact same portfolio weights.…”
Section: Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The main characteristic of MaxEntropy is that it generates fully connected networks, i.e., it assumes maximum diversification. Di Gangi et al (2015) show that, in the case of bipartite networks, MaxEntropy implies that all market participants hold the exact same portfolio weights.…”
Section: Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, this paper contributes to different strands of literature: first, we add to the growing literature on reconstructing financial networks from partial information (Squartini et al (2017); Gandy and Veraart (2017); Anand et al (2017); see Squartini et al (2018) for a recent survey). For the case of bipartite networks we are only aware of the works of Di Gangi et al (2015) and Squartini et al (2017). Given that most existing reconstruction methods have been designed for the case of unipartite credit networks, we adjust some of these methods to the case of bipartite networks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Price impact Securities Investment Nier et al (2007) exponential † single long Gai and Kapadia (2010) exponential † single long Arinaminpathy et al (2012) exponential † multiple ‡ long Cont and Wagalath (2013) linear multiple long/short Huang et al (2013) linear multiple long Caccioli et al (2014) exponential † multiple long Di Gangi et al (2018) linear multiple ‡ long Greenwood et al (2015) linear multiple long Caccioli et al (2015) linear single long Battiston et al (2016) linear multiple long Serri et al (2016) linear multiple long Cont and Schaanning (2017) linear multiple long Table 1: A survey of price impact functions and portfolio investment constraints utilised in shared-asset models of financial contagion. †corresponds to "linear market impact for log-prices" (Caccioli et al, 2014, p.238).…”
Section: Papermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The portfolio holdings of the N banks can be represented by using a bipartite graph, where the first set of nodes is composed by the N banks and the second set of nodes is composed by the M risky investments; i.e. each bank j investing in the investment asset i can be represented by a link in the bipartite network connecting the bank node j with the investment node i (see Duarte andEisenbach 2013 andDi Gangi et al 2015 for the properties of such network in the US banking system).…”
Section: Overlapping Portfoliosmentioning
confidence: 99%