2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.09.048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the ability of soil tests to estimate labile phosphorus in agricultural soils: Evidence from isotopic exchange

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of the error in calibrated energy, the 0th and 100th percentiles were set to −0.05 and 0.05 eV (see Figure S1). This implies a slightly smaller error than that associated with energy calibration itself (±0.11 eV, [18]), but represents the error range observed when variscite was used as an internal calibration check. For the normalization errors, we assumed a maximum error of 7% from the initial LCF at E 0 and below.…”
Section: Uncertainty Analysismentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the case of the error in calibrated energy, the 0th and 100th percentiles were set to −0.05 and 0.05 eV (see Figure S1). This implies a slightly smaller error than that associated with energy calibration itself (±0.11 eV, [18]), but represents the error range observed when variscite was used as an internal calibration check. For the normalization errors, we assumed a maximum error of 7% from the initial LCF at E 0 and below.…”
Section: Uncertainty Analysismentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Four additional samples-Ekebo A3, Ekebo D3, Fors A3, and Fors D3-were taken from the Swedish long-term soil fertility experiments. The Ekebo soil was a loamy Haplic Phaeozem, whereas the Fors soil was a silty-loamy Calcaric Phaeozem [10,15,18]. The samples were taken from the A horizon (0-20 cm), and are from plots receiving different amounts of PK fertilizer, where the A3 plots received no P or K, whereas the D3 plots received 30 kg P and 80 kg K ha −1 yr −1 , plus replacement of harvested P and K. Tärnsjö Oe and Tärnsjö Bs are from a sandy Haplic Podzol 60 km NW of Uppsala, Sweden, where the Oe horizon is from the mor layer and the Bs horizon is from the uppermost part of the B horizon at 10-20 cm depth.…”
Section: Soil Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An estimation of potential P availability has often been based on total soil P concentrations, P lability, the presence of P binding sites and/or has been characterized by P adsorption behavior of the soil simulated by adsorption isotherms in batch equilibrium experiments (Leinweber et al 1999 ; Maguire et al 2001 ; Shaheen et al 2007 , 2009 ; Braun et al 2019 ). Some studies also used P species determined by P K -edge X-ray absorption near-edge structure (XANES) spectroscopy to estimate P availability under different fertilization scenarios (Eriksson et al 2016 ; Koch et al 2018 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different soil characteristics affected the relationship between added P and Olsen-P. The untreated soil Olsen-P (c) was positively influenced by TP and CAlox prior to P addition, and negatively influenced by A/CMnox, suggesting that the Olsen extraction method can more efficiently extract P from CAlox than A/CMnox (Braun et al, 2019). It has been shown that phosphate binding to C/AAlox consists mainly of surface complexes that are readily extracted by weak extraction solutions (Gypser, Hirsch, Schleicher, & Freese, 2018;Gypser, Schutze, & Freese, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%