2011
DOI: 10.3109/08958378.2011.608094
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the application of acute toxic gas standards

Abstract: By analyzing the standards with respect to these factors, we can acquire a better understanding of the applicability of each.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Research indicates that noxious gases can be harmful to humans, even at low concentrations, causing damage to the nervous and respiratory systems. Certain toxic odorous gases, such as H 2 S gas, can even lead to poisoning and the onset of cancer [46]. Therefore, the detection of the components of polluting gases in polluted sites holds significant importance.…”
Section: Voc In Situ Monitoring Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research indicates that noxious gases can be harmful to humans, even at low concentrations, causing damage to the nervous and respiratory systems. Certain toxic odorous gases, such as H 2 S gas, can even lead to poisoning and the onset of cancer [46]. Therefore, the detection of the components of polluting gases in polluted sites holds significant importance.…”
Section: Voc In Situ Monitoring Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For some gases acute toxic gas standards were developed for occupational, military, and civilian use that predict or establish guidelines for limiting exposure to inhaled toxic gases. Nevertheless, large disparities between guidelines exist for similar exposure scenarios, such as: Acute Exposure Guidelines (AEGL), Immediate Danger to Life or Health (IDLH), Purser, International Organization for Standardization (ISO 13571), Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), or Agency for toxic Substance and Disease Registry (ATSDR) (Iyoho et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%