In January 2013, the Department of Defense lifted a ban that had prevented women from holding combat positions in the military. However, innate differences in physical traits and physiology between men and women likely will result in differences in physical performance. Sex differences in thermoregulation is a key area that needs to be examined due to the potential impact on physical performance. Therefore, we expanded our previously developed thermoregulation model (TRM) to include the effects of gender. Women have been found to have a lower sweat output in heat stress and lesser shivering in cold stress than men; therefore, the equations for sweat mass loss rate and shivering heat generation were modified for women accordingly. The updated TRM showed good agreement with female data collected from exercise in cool to hot conditions, cold air exposure, and cold water immersion. Gender differences in sweat evaporation appear minimal except for sufficiently high exercise-heat combinations. Gender differences in core temperature and heat generation during cold stress are significant. The expanded TRM can be used to assess gender-specific thermal response with future application to predicting performance differences and optimizing warfighter effectiveness for a wide range of military relevant tasks.

No abstract

Addition of dose-response curves provides a critical augmentation to BURNSIM to improve operational risk assessments of burn hazard. Future recommendations for BURNSIM include the use of body location- and gender-specific parameters with coupling to a thermoregulatory model.

No abstract

OBJECTIVE Skeletal stress fracture of the lower limbs remains a significant problem for the military. The objective of this study was to develop a subject-specific 3D reconstruction of the tibia using only a few CT images for the prediction of peak stresses and locations. METHODS Full bilateral tibial CT scans were recorded for 63 healthy college male participants. A 3D finite element (FE) model of the tibia for each subject was generated from standard CT cross-section data (i.e., 4%, 14%, 38%, and 66% of the tibial length) via a transformation matrix. The final reconstructed FE models were used to calculate peak stress and location on the tibia due to a simulated walking load (3,700 N), and compared to the raw models. RESULTS The density-weighted, spatially-normalized errors between the raw and reconstructed CT models were small. The mean percent difference between the raw and reconstructed models for peak stress (0.62%) and location (−0.88%) was negligible. CONCLUSIONS Subject-specific tibia models can provide even great insights into the mechanisms of stress fracture injury, which are common in military and athletic settings. Rapid development of 3D tibia models allows for the future work of determining peak stress-related injury correlates to stress fracture outcomes.