2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2011.11.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the corrosion of biodegradable magnesium implants: A critical review of current methodologies and their limitations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
508
0
15

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 753 publications
(532 citation statements)
references
References 133 publications
9
508
0
15
Order By: Relevance
“…This allowed the presence of HCO 3 − , which is another important ion that promotes (Mg,Ca)-CO 3 formation at the surface layer. The stirring produced a dynamic flow making the sample and funnel an 'open' system avoiding a local pH increase inside the funnel, which falsifies the in vitro data, as other authors reported (Hofstetter et al, 2015b;Kirkland et al, 2012).…”
Section: Degradation Rate Analysismentioning
confidence: 79%
“…This allowed the presence of HCO 3 − , which is another important ion that promotes (Mg,Ca)-CO 3 formation at the surface layer. The stirring produced a dynamic flow making the sample and funnel an 'open' system avoiding a local pH increase inside the funnel, which falsifies the in vitro data, as other authors reported (Hofstetter et al, 2015b;Kirkland et al, 2012).…”
Section: Degradation Rate Analysismentioning
confidence: 79%
“…A detailed description of each technique can be found in any one of several good reviews [54,55,58]. Each technique has strengths and limitations.…”
Section: Magnesium Corrosion Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method is discussed in more detail in Section "Ratio of solution volume to sample area", and may be worthy of critical analysis. Kirkland et al [72] used a ratio of 20 mL of solution per 1 cm 2 of sample surface area, which is below the desired level, also discussed in Section "Ratio of solution volume to sample area" and in another work by the same group [58].…”
Section: Proteinsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations