2018
DOI: 10.3390/su10051628
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the Cost of Damage and Effect of Adaptation to Landslides Considering Climate Change

Abstract: Abstract:The amount of damage caused by landslides has increased due to climate change. Adaptation plans are required to help cope with landslides in order to reduce the extent of the damage. Landslide hazard analysis can help create adaptation plans. Analyzing the cost of damage of and the effect of adaptation to landslides is an effective way to support decision makers. The cost of damage is calculated using the costs of damage incurred in residential and transportation areas in the past, based on data from … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many traditional risk assessment approaches have been extensively applied to perform risk assessment in different sectors. Nevertheless, in assessing the threat of landslides, for example, a limited number of studies have been undertaken to investigate the cost of damage or quantitatively analysed the effects of adaptation, which are probably because of the difficulties of collecting reliable data and of evaluating the effect of adaptation using an objective approach (Kim et al, 2018). Owing to the inadequacy of historical or statistical data on climate risks assessment, the high-level uncertainties in data (UNCTAD, 2012) make traditional probabilistic risk analysis methods, such as Quantitative Risk Assessment (Nicolet-Monnier & Ghenorghe, 1996;Urciuoli, 2011) unsuited for climate adaptation study at this stage .…”
Section: Critical Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many traditional risk assessment approaches have been extensively applied to perform risk assessment in different sectors. Nevertheless, in assessing the threat of landslides, for example, a limited number of studies have been undertaken to investigate the cost of damage or quantitatively analysed the effects of adaptation, which are probably because of the difficulties of collecting reliable data and of evaluating the effect of adaptation using an objective approach (Kim et al, 2018). Owing to the inadequacy of historical or statistical data on climate risks assessment, the high-level uncertainties in data (UNCTAD, 2012) make traditional probabilistic risk analysis methods, such as Quantitative Risk Assessment (Nicolet-Monnier & Ghenorghe, 1996;Urciuoli, 2011) unsuited for climate adaptation study at this stage .…”
Section: Critical Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These events usually cause losses and casualties in populations, due to the poor capacity of stakeholders to make adequate decisions [1]. Furthermore, the extent of damage caused by landslides is amplified by climate change [2]. Slow landslides provoked by hydrometeorological effects are becoming more and more frequent around the world and hinder a economic development [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In developing countries, the lack of knowledge about these hazards worsens their impact [5]. Researchers have focused their efforts on improving the characterization and understanding of RILs, providing solid information to predict these events and to develop protection and mitigation measures [6]. Comprehensive analyses of the factors triggering RILs have been done via different methodologies for modelling of spatial-temporal processes [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Landslides are one of the main accidents caused by disasters in the world [1,2], resulting in social, environmental, and monetary losses [3]. Broad analyses of the consequences are fundamental to reduce harmful effects [4] and for sustainable development of areas that are susceptible to landslides [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%