Assessing the Drivers of Sustained Agricultural Economic Development in China: Agricultural Productivity and Poverty Reduction Efficiency

Abstract

Poverty eradication is a crucial element of SDG 1. Whether the financial resources invested by the Government provide a critical impetus for deeply impoverished rural areas needs to be studied by quantitative analysis. Therefore, this study presents a theoretical analytical framework for agricultural production–government poverty reduction. It divides the poverty reduction process into two stages, agricultural production and poverty reduction, from the perspective of sustainable agricultural development. The comprehensive measurement and spatio-temporal evolution analysis of China’s agricultural production and poverty reduction efficiency are conducted using a novel dynamic two-stage DEA model, which incorporates non-expected factors. The study found that (1) China’s agricultural production and poverty reduction efficiency exhibit overall poor performance, characterized by two poles of differentiation. (2) The agricultural production efficiency score is higher in the northern region than in the southern region, while the poverty reduction efficiency score is higher in the eastern region compared to the western region. (3) The coupling and coordination between China’s production efficiency and poverty reduction efficiency are inadequate.

Increasing Sustainable Economic Growth: Financial Performance and Capital Expenditures

“…[36]The government plays an important role in development and the economy, ultimately improving societyʹs welfare. [37]. Regional financial efficiency varies from inefficient to highly efficient.…”

Rainfall’s impact on agricultural production and government poverty reduction efficiency in China

“…In this study, on the basis of fully considering the impact of governmental inputs on agricultural infrastructure, and referring to the existing research results 60 – 62 , in the second stage of the model, the “index of infrastructure for sustainable development of agriculture” was used as the expected output to be included in the analytical framework. In the second stage of the model, the expected output of “Sustainable Agricultural Development Infrastructure Index” is incorporated into the analytical framework, which consists of five secondary indicators, including postal and telecommunication facilities, ecological and environmental facilities, water resources and water supply and drainage facilities, energy and power facilities, and road transportation facilities, and covers 22 specific sub-indicators.…”