2007
DOI: 10.1007/s00535-006-1952-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the efficacy of famotidine and rebamipide in the treatment of gastric mucosal lesions in patients receiving long-term NSAID therapy (FORCE—famotidine or rebamipide in comparison by endoscopy)

Abstract: Famotidine was superior to rebamipide in treating NSAID-associated mucosal lesions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, we examined RA patients selected from the population of the FORCE study but found that the risk factors and prevalence of gastric mucosal injury, and also the efficacy of famotidine (20 mg/day), were similar to the respective results obtained for the entire FORCE study population [9,10]. Our results suggest that treatment with famotidine (20 mg/day) is effective even in RA patients, who are often administered steroids or DMARDs concomitantly with NSAIDs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this study, we examined RA patients selected from the population of the FORCE study but found that the risk factors and prevalence of gastric mucosal injury, and also the efficacy of famotidine (20 mg/day), were similar to the respective results obtained for the entire FORCE study population [9,10]. Our results suggest that treatment with famotidine (20 mg/day) is effective even in RA patients, who are often administered steroids or DMARDs concomitantly with NSAIDs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…The study has already been published in detail elsewhere [9,10]. For this report, we selected 100 RA patients from the FORCE study population and examined the prevalence of gastric mucosal injury in RA patients receiving long-term NSAID therapy to identify patient factors contributing to the development of such mucosal injury and compare the effects of famotidine and rebamipide in the treatment of NSAID-induced gastric mucosal injury of RA patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23 It also prevented peptic ulcers as effectively as misoprostol and famotidine in patients on long-term NSAIDs treatment. 24,25 Mizoguchi et al 16 suggested that rebamipide is effi cacious in preventing NSAID-induced small-intestinal lesions in rats. These basic and clinical data regarding NSAIDinduced gastrointestinal injury suggest that rebamipide has a preventive effect for intestinal events.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yamao et al 8 compared the effects of famotidine (a H 2 -receptor antagonist) and rebamipide (a gastric mucosal defensive drug) on NSAID-associated gastric mucosal lesions using upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in Japan, and famotidine was superior to rebamipide in treating NSAID-associated mucosal lesions.…”
Section: Relationship Between Nsaids Ulcer and H Pylori Infectionmentioning
confidence: 98%