Payment for Environmental Services in Agricultural Landscapes 2008
DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-77354-4_11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the Feasibility of Wetlands Conservation: Using Payments for Ecosystem Services in Pallisa, Uganda

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The common perception that strong winds had become more frequent and more severe in Pallisa is attributed to deforestation and wetland degradation which strips the landscape of its protection from winds by vegetation. Whereas forests reduce the effects of wind by serving as windbreaks (Government of Uganda, 2007), wetland degradation through conversion for rice farming and deforestation due to clearance of swamp forests are major environmental challenges in Pallisa district (Nalukenge et al, 2009). For instance, by the year 2000, 68% of the seasonal wetlands in Pallisa district were already converted for rice cultivation, and Isingiro was facing serious land degradation due to overutilisation (NEMA, 2000).…”
Section: Perception Of Climate Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The common perception that strong winds had become more frequent and more severe in Pallisa is attributed to deforestation and wetland degradation which strips the landscape of its protection from winds by vegetation. Whereas forests reduce the effects of wind by serving as windbreaks (Government of Uganda, 2007), wetland degradation through conversion for rice farming and deforestation due to clearance of swamp forests are major environmental challenges in Pallisa district (Nalukenge et al, 2009). For instance, by the year 2000, 68% of the seasonal wetlands in Pallisa district were already converted for rice cultivation, and Isingiro was facing serious land degradation due to overutilisation (NEMA, 2000).…”
Section: Perception Of Climate Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…PES provides positive incentives for farmers to preserve environmental resources. While a PES system also requires monitoring and verification of compliance with contracts to provide ecosystem services, it allows for a more positive relationship between farmers and the government (Nalukenge 2006). Several policy initiatives have attempted to balance the needs for agricultural production and for ecosystem services.…”
Section: Farmer Participation and Incentive Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since its introduction, the MD model has been made available in several formats on the world wide web (as an Excel spread sheet, and in SAS), disseminated through graduate courses and training workshops, used to evaluate ES supply for a number of production systems (e.g., Immerzeel et al. 2008; Nalukenge et al. 2009; Claessens et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%