2020
DOI: 10.1186/s12863-020-00914-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the genetic diversity of cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.] germplasm collections using phenotypic traits and SNP markers

Abstract: Background Productivity of cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp] in sub-Sahara Africa is curtailed by a lack of farmer-preferred and improved cultivars and modern production technologies. The objectives of the study were to determine the extent of genetic diversity present among a collection of cowpea accessions from Zambia and Malawi using phenotypic traits and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers and, to select distinct and complementary parental lines for cultivar development. One hun… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
24
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(62 reference statements)
2
24
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The clustering maps estimated from 58 morphological traits and 31 SSR markers demonstrated discordance to a certain extent. This was confirmed by the results exhibited by the Mantel test, consistent with earlier studies on other vegetable species [17,45]. Unexpectedly, 31 genetic and 58 morphological markers both showed a moderate-quality clustering, which indicates they were not identifying the varieties well separately.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The clustering maps estimated from 58 morphological traits and 31 SSR markers demonstrated discordance to a certain extent. This was confirmed by the results exhibited by the Mantel test, consistent with earlier studies on other vegetable species [17,45]. Unexpectedly, 31 genetic and 58 morphological markers both showed a moderate-quality clustering, which indicates they were not identifying the varieties well separately.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…We continued to assemble SNP fingerprints of parental lines and used them to dissect the genetic relationships among parents and the F 1 progenies to discern which crosses benefited from maximum diversity between the parents. Analysis of genetic relatedness among plant germplasm plays a key role in plant breeding as it allows effective characterization of parental lines for hybridization (Govindaraj et al, 2015;Mafakheri et al, 2017;Khanna, 2018;Nkhoma et al, 2020). In the present study, genetic similarity analysis placed the parental lines into three groups, with a modest amount of variation still detectable within the groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…This process is lengthy and costly, yet the eventual creation of the intended variation through hybridization and the ability to further study the genetics of cowpea cultivar development requires validity of the initial cross. First, the parents of a cross should not be genetically similar in order to maximize the diversity for selection and improvement (Mafakheri et al, 2017;Nkhoma et al, 2020). It is therefore advantageous to fingerprint parental lines and assess relatedness prior to hybridization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, SARI-2-2-1 and SARI-5-5-5 used 62.56 ± 2.18 and 59.78 ± 4.96 days to reach DNPM, respectively, compared with Songotra (64.67 ± 0.07) ( Table 5 ). Early maturity is precursor for drought escape, thus cultivars with a short flowering period and maturity are mostly preferred by farmers ( Nkhoma et al., 2020 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%