A problem of rationalizing industrial wastewater treatment is considered. It issues from that industrial enterprises may violate conventions about water treatment, so then they are fined. Those fines are directed to control water pollution by measuring it and treating wastewater additionally, if necessary. Under threat of heavy fines, however, an enterprise may reduce or stop its manufacturing resulting in a budget cut for water resources conservation and recirculation. Therefore, fining for under-treating industrial wastewater is balanced using an environmental protection model in the form of a dyadic 3-person game. According to this game, in which three subjects of water pollution (industrial enterprises) are obliged to treat industrial wastewater, the ecologically healthy water balance of the reservoir does not worsen if just one subject does not apply the treatment. Such model implies that about one third of the polluted water recovers without treatment. If none of the subjects applies a water treatment system, they are fined (with a 3-fine for each). If only two subjects do not treat wastewater, all the three subjects are fined (with a 2-fine for each) due to impossibility of finding those two violators. Application of a water treatment system costs a conventional unit for each subject per a period of time (a day, a week, or a month). The game solution is searched on the regular finite lattice of situations, which is obtained by sampling the continuous set of those situations. Dealing with either non-symmetric or non-profitable situations, an approximate solution is found using concessions in the equilibrium. By this solution, the water treatment system is turned off for 3 periods of 10, and the 2-fine is optimally set at 0.34 units, whereas the 3-fine is set at 1.394 units. Under threat of the heavy 3-fine, the subjects will definitely come to a convention of scheduling the water treatment systems. Switching from "clean" to "polluting" manufacturing and backwards is to be controlled exactly once per those 10 periods. Eventually, the cost of 8.018 units for a subject is just the expected spending, whereas the least cost in 7 units is still possible under the corresponding water treatment schedule.