“…There is evidence supporting the use of MC-CBM for monitoring students' progress (Stecker, Fuchs, & Fuchs, 2005), modifying instruction for students with varying abilities (Slavin, & Lake, 2008), informing instructional groupings (McLeskey & Waldron, 2011), adapting instruction for students with disabilities (McMaster, Fuchs, Fuchs, & Compton, 2005), identifying students' academic strengths and weaknesses (Stecker, Fuchs, & Fuchs, 2005), supporting peer-assisted learning (Calhoon & Fuchs, 2003), and predicting students' performance on statewide assessments (Helwig, Anderson, & Tindal, 2002). The current study was informed by studies that examined performance indicators on MC-CBM to classify students (Burns, VanDerHeyden, & Jiban, 2006; VanDerHeyden & Burns, 2005), investigated the administration of MC-CBM on higher (Fuchs, Fuchs, Compton, Bryant, Hamlett, & Seethaler, 2007) compared to earlier grades (Clarke & Shinn, 2004; Hintze Christ, & Keller, 2002; Jitendra, Dupuis, & Zaslofsky, 2014; Shapiro, Dennis, & Fu, 2015; Thurber et al., 2002), and used MC-CBM to screen for students with LD in mathematics (Christ, Johnson-Gros, & Hintze, 2005; Fuchs et al, 2007; Hintze et al., 2002).…”