2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2012.11.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the mammalian toxicity of high-boiling petroleum substances under the rubric of the HPV program

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…20, 28, 29 ARC profiles 28 of the substances tested in our study comprised of sample-specific weight percentages for aromatic compounds containing 1 through 7 rings. 30 Total weight percentages of aromatic compounds were obtained across all petroleum substances as detailed in Methods, they ranged between 2.1 and 9.9% (4.7–6.5% for SRGOs, 2.3–6.6% for OGOs, 2.1–9.9% for VHGOs, and 2.3–5.4% for HFOs).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20, 28, 29 ARC profiles 28 of the substances tested in our study comprised of sample-specific weight percentages for aromatic compounds containing 1 through 7 rings. 30 Total weight percentages of aromatic compounds were obtained across all petroleum substances as detailed in Methods, they ranged between 2.1 and 9.9% (4.7–6.5% for SRGOs, 2.3–6.6% for OGOs, 2.1–9.9% for VHGOs, and 2.3–5.4% for HFOs).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For mineral oils, products with a high concentration of polycyclic aromatic compounds (PAC) with 3-7 rings (parent PAHs, short-alkylated MOAH, compounds containing heteroatoms), such as unrefined and poorly refined base oils, were carcinogenic in mouse skin painting assays (Roy et al 1988;McKee, Daughtrey, et al 1989;Blackburn et al 1996;Mackerer et al 2003). The aromatics concentration was determined by target analytics for specific parent PAHs (McKee, Daughtrey, et al 1989;Concawe 1994) and by solvent extraction with dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) followed by GC separation according to the ring number using two to seven ring unsubstituted PAHs as internal standards (Roy et al 1988;Mackerer et al 2003;Gray et al 2013). The latter technique is used by the Mobil PAC Method for predicting dermal carcinogenicity (see below).…”
Section: Carcinogenicity Of Pahs and Moahmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Abbreviations: DMSO, dimethyl sulfoxide; PAC, polycyclic aromatic compound. a As determined by PAC-2 method. 2022 b “ARC 1%” is the weight percent (wt%) of PACs that have 1 aromatic ring within the total sample. “ARC 2%” is the percent of PACs with 2 aromatic rings, and so forth to 7 aromatic rings. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Abbreviations: BMD, benchmark dose; [Hb], hemoglobin content; NP, not predicted; PAC, polycyclic aromatic compound; PDR 10 , predicted dose for 10% change. a As determined by PAC-2 method. 2022 b In those situations in which the test material has a dose–response curve that is relatively flat, the model may either predict a slightly increasing or slightly decreasing dose response (random variation problem). If the model predicts a dose response that is contrary to what is expected for the end point (say a slope of 0.01 where a negative slope is expected), then no model prediction is presented.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%