Assessing the precision of wild boar density estimations

Abstract

Effective management of wild boar (Sus scrofa) populations has to be based on precise estimates of local densities. The development of an effective and cost-efficient technique to cope with this need has always represented a challenge for wildlife managers and researchers. Drive counts, hunting bags, and Random Encounter Model (REM) are among the most frequently used techniques, with the latter recently gaining wide recognition. We sought to compare the 3 methods in terms of their suitability for management, precision, and effort required. Moreover, we evaluated the uncertainty of REM results when all sources of error were considered. In our study, the 3 methods were applied to a wild boar population of the Italian Apennines in 2013. We used the delta method to assess the total uncertainty of REM density estimates on the basis of the errors associated to all the parameters involved.Notably, the 3 methods tested showed consistent mean density estimates, though none of them reached fully satisfying levels of precision for management purposes. Since the low precision of REM was mostly due to the high variability of the group-size parameter, we propose simple technical improvements aimed at reducing the variability of this parameter and, thus, of REM. Although all the methods tested still need to be further developed to be effective for wild boar management, REM seems to be the most promising one in terms of both

A simulation-based evaluation of methods for estimating census population size of terrestrial game species from genetically-identified parent-offspring pairs

“…Recent studies have shown that current methods used to estimate population abundance of game species need to be improved to be more useful for management purposes ( Guerrasio et al, 2022 ), particularly as hunted ungulates have reached unprecedented high densities in most of Europe ( Apollonio, Andersen & Putman, 2010 ) leading to increasing human-wildlife conflicts ( e.g. , Massei, Roy & Bunting, 2011 ).…”

One Health at gunpoint: Impact of wild boars as exotic species in Brazil - A review

“…Effective wild boar management and population monitoring have relied on accurate estimative of population density and spreading [ 103 ], with wild boar presence in Brazil confirmed since the 1980's [ 9 ]. Despite few studies of individual numbers and behavior in Brazil, higher female and piglet population in different conservation units have revealed ideal nursery habitats for wild boars, particularly due to hunting prohibition in such areas [ 17 ].…”

African Swine Fever: The State of the Art in Italy

“…In the last few decades, wild boar populations underwent a considerable expansion that led to the colonisation of new habitats such as agricultural lands and peri-urban and urban areas. The Italian Apennines showed a high wild boar population, ranging from four to eighteen animals for Km 2 [25]. A more recent study on wild boar distribution from Western Europe to Central-Northern Asia showed a large variety of animal densities in Italy, ranging from zero to up to more than ten, depending on the characteristics of the territory and its vegetation stratum [26].…”