1999
DOI: 10.1093/biomet/86.1.183
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the predictive influence of cases in a state space process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Extension to non-linear and non-Gaussian state space models is possible, but requires adopting a probabilistic perspective (Kitagawa, 1987;Carlin et al, 1992; Kitagawa, 1998). The development of diagnostics for state space models, which assess the observation influence (Cavanaugh and Johnson, 1999) as well as the observing array design, provide important extensions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Extension to non-linear and non-Gaussian state space models is possible, but requires adopting a probabilistic perspective (Kitagawa, 1987;Carlin et al, 1992; Kitagawa, 1998). The development of diagnostics for state space models, which assess the observation influence (Cavanaugh and Johnson, 1999) as well as the observing array design, provide important extensions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, it is expressed in terms of the smoother state rather than the predicted observations. The diagnostics (3) and (4) can be regarded as special cases of predictive influence functions (Johnson and Geisser, 1983;Cavanaugh and Johnson, 1999). We are also interested in a retrospective assessment of the sampling protocol, or the observing array design, used in the plankton monitoring program.…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following Cavanaugh and Johnson (1999), we use an information theoretic approach to develop a disparity measure that gauges the similarity of two state-space processes by comparing posterior (conditional) densities of the unobserved states. (Based on these results, a measure targeting the marginal densities of the states is developed in the next subsection.…”
Section: A2 General State-space Divergence Measurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The K-L discrepancy has also been utilized to develop measures for diagnosing influential values in a data set. In the state-space framework, Cavanaugh and Johnson (1999) proposed a diagnostic based on the K-L discrepancy for the identification of cases that influence the recovery of the latent signal. Cavanaugh and Oleson (2001) generalized this diagnostic to the broader modeling problem of identifying cases that impact the recovery of missing or unobserved data.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%