2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10896-014-9602-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the Reliability of Retrospective Reports of Adverse Childhood Experiences among Adolescents with Documented Childhood Maltreatment

Abstract: The literature suggests that childhood maltreatment is related to a higher probability of developing psychopathology and disease in adulthood. However, some authors have questioned the reliability of self-reports of maltreatment, suggesting that psychopathology at the time of evaluation affects self-reports. We evaluated the reliability of the self-reports of 79 young adults who were identified in childhood by Child Protective Services by comparing two moments of evaluation. Psychological and physical symptoms… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
75
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
10
75
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Some evidence suggests ACEs may be subject to recall bias, especially for those who are currently depressed (Scott, Smith, & Ellis, ). Other studies, however, indicate that current symptoms do not affect the reliability of reports of child maltreatment in young adults (Pinto, Correia, & Maia, ). In addition, the relation between number of ACEs and negative outcomes holds for both prospective (Clark et al, ; Scott et al, ) and retrospective studies (Afifi et al, ; Anda et al, ), and comparisons of prospective and retrospective data show no bias in assessment and no differences among associations between number of ACEs and outcomes as a function of time of reporting (Hardt, Vellaisamy, & Schoon, ; Scott, Smith, & Ellis, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Some evidence suggests ACEs may be subject to recall bias, especially for those who are currently depressed (Scott, Smith, & Ellis, ). Other studies, however, indicate that current symptoms do not affect the reliability of reports of child maltreatment in young adults (Pinto, Correia, & Maia, ). In addition, the relation between number of ACEs and negative outcomes holds for both prospective (Clark et al, ; Scott et al, ) and retrospective studies (Afifi et al, ; Anda et al, ), and comparisons of prospective and retrospective data show no bias in assessment and no differences among associations between number of ACEs and outcomes as a function of time of reporting (Hardt, Vellaisamy, & Schoon, ; Scott, Smith, & Ellis, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Further, there is a limitation in the collected reports of perceptions of Generation 1 rearing in that retrospective reports were obtained from parents, but not directly from the grandparents themselves. While retrospective reports have been used with the PBI and other measures (Tanaka et al, 2009), and show reasonable agreement between (Amodeo & Griffin, 2009) and within individuals over multiple measures (Pinto, et al, 2014), it is a limited means of data collection. In addition, although child reports of rearing were collected, there was heavy reliance on parents’ reports or parent-informed reports.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Parents reported retrospectively on views of their parents (Generation 1) as having displayed patterns of care and overprotection during their upbringing. Retrospective reports, though limited, have been shown to be valuable sources of information with considerable agreement between multiple reporters from shared environments (e.g., Amodeo & Griffin, 2009) and within individuals reporting on similar retrospective items over multiple time points (e.g., Pinto, Correia, & Maia, 2014). Parents also reported on their (Generation 2) current perceptions of care and overprotection toward their children.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The retrospective nature of this type of assessment has led to much discussion regarding the validity and reliability of retrospective reports. A series of studies evaluating the validity and reliability of such reports have generally supported this methodology (Pinto, Correia, & Maia, ; Widom & Shepard, ), although one area of concern has been the underreporting of abuse experiences (e.g., false negatives; Dube, Williamson, Thompson, Felitti, & Anda, 2004).…”
Section: Definition Of Childhood Abuse and Acesmentioning
confidence: 99%