2011
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-011-0693-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the removal of pharmaceuticals and personal care products in a full-scale activated sludge plant

Abstract: The main removal mechanism of PhACs and musks studied in the WWTP was most often biological (45%), followed by adsorption (33%) and by UV radiation (22%). In the majority of the cases, the WWTP achieved>75% removal of the most detected PhACs and musks, with the exception of diclofenac.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
47
0
5

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 149 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
5
47
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…This is due to low biodegradability caused by the presence of Cl atoms and N-H group that inhibit the growth of bacteria in wastewater. Diclofenac can be also removed through photolysis (25-75%) [19,20]. The application of membrane filters allows the removal of diclofenac by about 58%.…”
Section: Diclofenacmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is due to low biodegradability caused by the presence of Cl atoms and N-H group that inhibit the growth of bacteria in wastewater. Diclofenac can be also removed through photolysis (25-75%) [19,20]. The application of membrane filters allows the removal of diclofenac by about 58%.…”
Section: Diclofenacmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sedimentation allows the removal of 12-45%. However, the main mechanism behind this process is decomposition to hydroxyl and carbonyl groups, and the products of decomposition are removed through membrane filtration [19,20]. Ibuprofen is efficiently removed through adsorption on activated carbons (up to 99%) and ozonation (up to 80%) [7].…”
Section: Ibuprofenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the latter case, the level of the investigated compound is higher in the effluent than that in the influent to one of the treatment units or over the entire WWTP (Blair et al, 2013). Reasons for this can include the release of fecal particles during wastewater treatment, significant desorption from the return activated sludge thereby increasing their concentration throughout the treatment process (Göbel et al, 2007;Salgado et al, 2012) or the transformation of conjugate compounds to the parent compound during biological treatment (Monteiro and Boxall, 2010;Salgado et al, 2012). Negative removals for compounds that are not excreted from the human body, such as pesticides, pharmaceuticals and personal care products have also been reported, making the latter reason less likely.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[23,24] A recent study by Salgado et al highlighted inefficient removal of DCF by WWTPs. [25] The prevalence of DCF in the environment has resulted in increased interest to combat its further accumulation in the environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%