2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.inffus.2009.04.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the role of attention in the audiovisual integration of speech

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
58
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
9
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results are consistent with the previous findings (Nahorna et al 2012) Navarra et al 2010;Alsius et al 2014). Experiment B shows that attentional mechanisms may intervene at the level of single audiovisual sources in an audiovisual speech scene, selectively increasing or decreasing the amount of fusion depending on the coherence of the attended source.…”
Section: Response Timesupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The results are consistent with the previous findings (Nahorna et al 2012) Navarra et al 2010;Alsius et al 2014). Experiment B shows that attentional mechanisms may intervene at the level of single audiovisual sources in an audiovisual speech scene, selectively increasing or decreasing the amount of fusion depending on the coherence of the attended source.…”
Section: Response Timesupporting
confidence: 92%
“…For example, when the target location was not varied on a trial-by-trial basis, attention was shown to enhance multisensory integration for simple (e.g., Talsma & Woldorff, 2005) and complex stimuli (e.g., Alsius et al, 2005Alsius et al, , 2007Fairhall & Macaluso, 2009). Differences in the specific task requirements and stimulus properties aside (e.g., see Navarra, Alsius, Soto-Faraco, & Spence, 2010, for a discussion), the majority of these studies have at least shown that MSI can be influenced by endogenous forms of attention. Much less is known about the effects of exogenous spatial attention on MSI.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result suggests that the crossmodal effect of color on odor perception is not mandatory (or, in Stevenson and Oaten's words, "automatic"). As such, it provides some evidence against color influencing odor perception through a process of bottom-up multisensory integration (perhaps leading to sensory dominance) since research in other areas of psychology has shown that multisensory integration tends to be relatively automatic (i.e., unaffected by the performance of a secondary task; see Navarra et al 2009;Santangelo and Spence 2008 for reviews).…”
Section: Isolating the Bottom-up Effects Of Color On Flavor Perceptionmentioning
confidence: 99%