1999
DOI: 10.1046/j.1526-100x.1999.72023.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the Success of Restoration Plantings in a Temperate New Zealand Forest

Abstract: The success of restoration plantings in restoring indigenous forest vascular plant and ground invertebrate biodiversity was assessed on previously grass‐covered sites in the eastern South Island, New Zealand. The composition and structure of grassland, three different aged restoration plantings (12, 30, and 35 years old), a naturally regenerating forest (100 years old), and a remnant of the original old‐growth forest of the area were measured. The restoration plantings are dominated by the native tree Olearia … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
64
1
4

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
7
64
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results agree with those of other similar studies, which suggest that the composition of beetles present at a site is related to environmental factors such as vegetative physiognomy (vegetation age, diversity, height and density) (Watts & Gibbs 2002;Grimbacher & Catterall 2007), presence of dead wood on the ground (Reay & Norton 1999) and LD (Sanderson et al 1995). With increasing age, restored plant communities in a mined peat bog at Torehape (35 km east of Whangamarino) become more diverse and structurally complex, resulting in the beetle community composition converging rapidly on the target community structure of an undisturbed peat bog (Watts et al 2008).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Our results agree with those of other similar studies, which suggest that the composition of beetles present at a site is related to environmental factors such as vegetative physiognomy (vegetation age, diversity, height and density) (Watts & Gibbs 2002;Grimbacher & Catterall 2007), presence of dead wood on the ground (Reay & Norton 1999) and LD (Sanderson et al 1995). With increasing age, restored plant communities in a mined peat bog at Torehape (35 km east of Whangamarino) become more diverse and structurally complex, resulting in the beetle community composition converging rapidly on the target community structure of an undisturbed peat bog (Watts et al 2008).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…These are issues to consider in selecting a restoration model and the degree and speed expected of the degradation process. Thus, an active model should be considered when the rate of degradation of the area of interest is high, because the planted species can be established quickly and create better conditions for a more diverse biological community as pointed by [5]. When the state and rate of degradation are not severe, the most appropriate model might be the passive restoration, allowing the ecosystem a natural 6 ISRN Soil Science recover [29], which had advantages from ecological and economic perspectives.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Passive restoration strategies imply minimal human intervention and are based on natural succession process, and in this way the restorer has a passive role regarding the process. On the other hand, active restoration strategies include planting trees at high density and their respective management [5]; this strategy implies a more active role of the restorer. Although passive restoration strategies are simple, inexpensive, and based on natural regeneration processes, they are not always successful [6,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reforestation projects typically progress through two main stages: an initial 'establishment' phase and a long-term 'building' phase (Kanowski and Catterall, 2007). Reforestation success can therefore be viewed as a continuum from the successful establishment of the initial planting through to maturation and realisation of the full environmental and socioeconomic benefits of the forest (Reay and Norton, 1999). This means that the measures of success will differ at different stages in a reforestation project.…”
Section: What Is Meant By Reforestation Success?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This means that the measures of success will differ at different stages in a reforestation project. Undertaking assessments at an early stage of a reforestation project can only indicate likely future success (Reay and Norton, 1999). As the forest matures more information is required to make judgements about environmental and socioeconomic success (King and Keeland, 1999;Reay and Norton, 1999).…”
Section: What Is Meant By Reforestation Success?mentioning
confidence: 99%