2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2017.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the urban carbon footprint: An overview

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
72
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 146 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
0
72
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The city-scale studies highlight the benefits of CBA for cities. In order to implement effective mitigation strategies, it is important to have accurate, comparable, and comprehensive GHG accounting (Wiedmann 2016, Fry et al 2018, see also the review by Lombardi et al 2017). Several authors state clearly that CBA should be adopted routinely in cities (Paloheimo and Salmi 2013, Feng et al 2014, Chen et al 2016a.…”
Section: City Policiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The city-scale studies highlight the benefits of CBA for cities. In order to implement effective mitigation strategies, it is important to have accurate, comparable, and comprehensive GHG accounting (Wiedmann 2016, Fry et al 2018, see also the review by Lombardi et al 2017). Several authors state clearly that CBA should be adopted routinely in cities (Paloheimo and Salmi 2013, Feng et al 2014, Chen et al 2016a.…”
Section: City Policiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rapid urbanization and economic growth have led to accelerating transport growth and substantial accompanying carbon emissions in China. Carbon emission reduction or carbon footprint downsizing are increasingly viewed as critical in promoting health benefits and environmentally-friendly cities [1,2]. China is the world's largest emitter of carbon dioxide and accounts for 27% of global emissions, and its transportation sector accounts for 12.7% of its total energy consumption [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To calculate city-scale absolute emissions, comparisons have been conducted among scope 1 (direct emissions from onsite fossil fuel consumption), scope 2 (indirect emissions from consuming energy such as purchased electricity, stream and heat) and scope 3 (other indirect emissions) (Lombardi et al, 2017). In addition, as for the accounting systems involved, concepts and contents of territorial, production-and consumption-based systems have been introduced (Lombardi et al, 2017), making accounting boundaries clear. Thus, two main methods have been…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%