2017
DOI: 10.1063/1.5005390
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the usability of Shazam mobile app

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After the simulation completed, the diagnosis appears in the display window along with its membership function. The membership functions displayed were mapped with the trust level adapted from Anurag (2014) Hussain (2017) and Kaur (2014)as shown in Table 5. From figure 2, the trust values of 0.6176 is considered as high.…”
Section: Simulation Of Fuzzy Logic Controllermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the simulation completed, the diagnosis appears in the display window along with its membership function. The membership functions displayed were mapped with the trust level adapted from Anurag (2014) Hussain (2017) and Kaur (2014)as shown in Table 5. From figure 2, the trust values of 0.6176 is considered as high.…”
Section: Simulation Of Fuzzy Logic Controllermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the major research fields that to tackle this issue is called user experience (UX). UX is a new theoretical concept that provides a holistic standpoint on users' interaction to web/mobile application with the uses of assistive technologies (Partala and Saari, 2015;Hussain et al 2017). It has become the main concern among researchers on current design trends in order to emerge abstract, subjective, and emotional qualities involved in any interaction processes (Taylor et al, 2011).…”
Section: Literature Reviews and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on past reviews, establishment of KMS has been developed usingseveral methodologies, strategies and objectives. In fact, there were difficulties reported in establishing effective KM in organization due to the scarcity of accurate methodologies used to outline the establishment and implementation of KMS (Chalmeta & Grangel, 2008).As an example, although more organizations are interested with the use of Web 2.0 tools for KMS implementation, but there were several weaknesses with the methodologies used to support the establishment of Web 2.0 based KMS (known as KMS 2.0) in addressing the needs of organizations (Chalmeta & Grangel, 2017) and (Hussain et al, 2017a). Based on Chalmeta & Grangel (2017) as well, weaknesses of existing methodologies to support Web 2.0 capabilities can be due to many factors; one of it such as use of nonpractical methodologies that are either too theoretical or never practically implemented.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%