Assessing the Viability of Social Media for Disseminating Evidence-Based Nutrition Practice Guideline Through Content Analysis of Twitter Messages and Health Professional Interviews: An Observational Study

Abstract

BackgroundGiven the high penetration of social media use, social media has been proposed as a method for the dissemination of information to health professionals and patients. This study explored the potential for social media dissemination of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Evidence-Based Nutrition Practice Guideline (EBNPG) for Heart Failure (HF).ObjectivesThe objectives were to (1) describe the existing social media content on HF, including message content, source, and target audience, and (2) describe the attitude of physicians and registered dietitian nutritionists (RDNs) who care for outpatient HF patients toward the use of social media as a method to obtain information for themselves and to share this information with patients.MethodsThe methods were divided into 2 parts. Part 1 involved conducting a content analysis of tweets related to HF, which were downloaded from Twitonomy and assigned codes for message content (19 codes), source (9 codes), and target audience (9 codes); code frequency was described. A comparison in the popularity of tweets (those marked as favorites or retweeted) based on applied codes was made using t tests. Part 2 involved conducting phone interviews with RDNs and physicians to describe health professionals’ attitude toward the use of social media to communicate general health information and information specifically related to the HF EBNPG. Interviews were transcribed and coded; exemplar quotes representing frequent themes are presented.ResultsThe sample included 294 original tweets with the hashtag “#heartfailure.” The most frequent message content codes were “HF awareness” (166/294, 56.5%) and “patient support” (97/294, 33.0%). The most frequent source codes were “professional, government, patient advocacy organization, or charity” (112/277, 40.4%) and “patient or family” (105/277, 37.9%). The most frequent target audience codes were “unable to identify” (111/277, 40.1%) and “other” (55/277, 19.9%). Significant differences were found in the popularity of tweets with (mean 1, SD 1.3 favorites) or without (mean 0.7, SD 1.3 favorites), the content code being “HF research” (P=.049). Tweets with the source code “professional, government, patient advocacy organizations, or charities” were significantly more likely to be marked as a favorite and retweeted than those without this source code (mean 1.2, SD 1.4 vs mean 0.8, SD 1.2, P=.03) and (mean 1.5, SD 1.8 vs mean 0.9, SD 2.0, P=.03). Interview participants believed that social media was a useful way to gather professional information. They did not believe that social media was useful for communicating with patients due to privacy concerns and the fact that the information had to be kept general rather than be tailored for a specific patient and the belief that their patients did not use social media or technology.ConclusionsExisting Twitter content related to HF comes from a combination of patients and evidence-based organizations; however, there is little nutrition content. That gap may present an opportunity for EBNPG dissem...

Analysis of Pinterest as a Tool for Dissemination of Nutrition Information for Parents of Teenagers

“…They found that health professionals tend to be more inclined to use the Internet and social media for their own research, but they tend to doubt the credibility of information shared. This study also highlighted a gap in nutrition information and the potential for dietitians to remedy this in the future (Hand, Kenne, Wolfram, Abram, & Fleming, 2016). Other health care professionals are acknowledging the potential for outreach to the layperson in order to disseminate pertinent educational materials.…”

“…This meta-analysis was unable to compare plant-based dairy alternative to cow's milk products due to a lack of research (Thorning et al, 2016). patients with heart failure (Hand, Kenne, Wolfram, Abram, & Fleming, 2016). They found that health professionals tend to be more inclined to use the Internet and social media for their own research, but they tend to doubt the credibility of information shared.…”

Prevent Stunting Campaign: Dissemination of Health Information through Instagram

“…According to Hand, Kenne, Wolfram, Abram, & Fleming (2016), health professionals generally use social media to gather information. In addition, Hazzam & Lahrech (2018) stated that social media support communication among health professionals and can increase daily productivity.…”

“…In addition, Hazzam & Lahrech (2018) stated that social media support communication among health professionals and can increase daily productivity. However, health professionals are skeptical that social media can be used to communicate and share information with patients, especially regarding privacy issues (Hand et al, 2016). With the role of individuals as a source of health information, the chances of misinformation and disinformation increase (Al Khaja, AlKhaja, & Sequeira, 2018;Loeb et al, 2018;Sommariva, Vamos, Mantzarlis, Đào, & Tyson, 2018).…”

Mining Facebook Data of People with Rare Diseases: A Content-Based and Temporal Analysis

“…Another interesting research study is [ 4 ], in which the authors states that, although health professionals use social media to gather information, they are skeptical of their value in communicating with patients. The current work is an extension of the preliminary analysis described in [ 5 ], which characterizes posts of the Spanish Federation of Rare Diseases (FEDER in Spanish).…”