2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2007.02.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing trade-offs between carbon sequestration and timber production within a framework of multi-purpose forestry in Austria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

11
120
2
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 177 publications
(142 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
11
120
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Taking into account the average harvest costs including labour (20-25 €/m 3 depending on tree species and site conditions - Seidl et al 2007), the net value of wood production is little more than three-quarters of the gross value (around 380 €/ha year timber and 240 €/ha year fuelwood).…”
Section: Economic Values Of Esmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taking into account the average harvest costs including labour (20-25 €/m 3 depending on tree species and site conditions - Seidl et al 2007), the net value of wood production is little more than three-quarters of the gross value (around 380 €/ha year timber and 240 €/ha year fuelwood).…”
Section: Economic Values Of Esmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latest version of PICUS v1.41 includes a process-based soil model of dynamic C and N cycling (Currie et al 1999) addressing interactions between aboveground production processes and belowground C and N dynamics (cf. Seidl et al 2007b).…”
Section: Picusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, multiple use forest management planning approach focuses on the integration of timber and non-wood forest products such as carbon, oxygen, water and soil production. But so far few studies attempted to integrate carbon sequestration and water production into forest planning (Díaz-Balteiro and Romero, 2003;Backeus et al, 2005;Keleş and Başkent, 2007;Seidl et al, 2007;Hennigar et al, 2008;Başkent et al, 2008). Similarly, few other studies developed a forest management planning model to integrate carbon, water and timber into forest management planning (Yolasıg maz, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%