2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11524-020-00471-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing Urban Health Inequities through a Multidimensional and Participatory Framework: Evidence from the EURO-HEALTHY Project

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results were presented to the Lisbon Municipality, contributing to inform the Health Plan for Quality of Life and Wellbeing of the City of Lisbon 2019–2020 [ 76 ]. Additionally, they integrated the evidence base for conducting local workshops with a panel of stakeholders, including decision-makers, to identify critical situations and inform local policies aimed at reducing health inequities [ 77 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results were presented to the Lisbon Municipality, contributing to inform the Health Plan for Quality of Life and Wellbeing of the City of Lisbon 2019–2020 [ 76 ]. Additionally, they integrated the evidence base for conducting local workshops with a panel of stakeholders, including decision-makers, to identify critical situations and inform local policies aimed at reducing health inequities [ 77 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The design of the conceptual and methodological framework follows previous studies of population health evaluation (Freitas et al, 2020;Santana, 2007Santana, , 2015Santana et al, 2017bSantana et al, , 2020 and is built upon the well-known "population health approach" with a geographic lens. This looks at how the population's health outcomes and health determinants are geographically distributed, as well as the extent to which policies and interventions from multiple sectors can address them (Kindig & Stoddart, 2003).…”
Section: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CDF, AC, and indicators were developed through the survey instrument and dialogue/discussion with municipality mayors and parish council presidents. This was limited due to time and cost constraints, whereas further combined qualitative approaches are recommended with the participation of different community stakeholders [187,188]. In developing the CDF and AC, statistical associations between neighbourhood characteristics and mental health outcomes were used, but this should not be interpreted as if there is a direct causality, as some indirect causes may justify the relationship [189].…”
Section: Strengths Limitations and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%