2019
DOI: 10.6009/jjrt.2019_jsrt_75.11.1316
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing Visual Attention of Mammography Positioning Using Eye Tracking System: A Comparison between Experts and Novices

Abstract: A common cause for image retakes in mammography is lack of proper positioning. Image retake is a potential hazard of increased radiation exposure to patient, patient discomfort and pain. Therefore, a mammographer has to provide fast exams with fewer retakes. Although evaluation of how a mammographer is effectively positioning has been studied in many ways, little research has been conducted to analyze visual attention. In this study, eye tracking system was adopted to detect eye movements and locations within … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Information on potential visual attention is widely used in marketing [11], sports [12], and the diagnosis of cognitive disorders [13]. A recently reported application in the field of radiological technology is the analysis of gazing during mammography between skilled and novice users [14]. We believe that the degrees of interest shown by visual attention to the target signals in a uniform phantom from medical images reflect the image quality and do not depend on experience or knowledge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Information on potential visual attention is widely used in marketing [11], sports [12], and the diagnosis of cognitive disorders [13]. A recently reported application in the field of radiological technology is the analysis of gazing during mammography between skilled and novice users [14]. We believe that the degrees of interest shown by visual attention to the target signals in a uniform phantom from medical images reflect the image quality and do not depend on experience or knowledge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%