1994
DOI: 10.1071/ea9940733
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing Wiltshire Horn-Merino crosses. 3. The 50% Wiltshire Horn as a prime lamb producer

Abstract: Wiltshire Horn-Merino (WH-M) and Border Leicester-Merino (BL-M) ewes, both with 50% Merino ancestry, were mated in late spring to lamb in 1985 and 1986 to either Dorset Horn (DH) or WH-M rams. Lambs from WH-M sires grew more slowly than lambs from DH sires, by 2 to 13% depending on dam breed and age of lamb. Lambs from WH-M dams grew 3 4 % slower than lambs from BL-M dams in 1985, a year of good pasture and with only DH rams used. In the following year, they grew at a similar rate from birth to weaning if from… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Differences between dam lines could mostly be attributed to the comparison of purebred Merino lines with the dual-purpose lines (Table 3). Rathie & Teasdale (1994) also found that purebred Merinos were outperformed by dual-purpose ewes. The lower dressing percentage of lambs from purebred Merino lines could be due to their generally thinner fat cover and more wool on the skins (Kirton et al, 1995).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Differences between dam lines could mostly be attributed to the comparison of purebred Merino lines with the dual-purpose lines (Table 3). Rathie & Teasdale (1994) also found that purebred Merinos were outperformed by dual-purpose ewes. The lower dressing percentage of lambs from purebred Merino lines could be due to their generally thinner fat cover and more wool on the skins (Kirton et al, 1995).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%