2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2006.12.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment and prevention of head motion during imaging of patients with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder

Abstract: The present study serves to detail the specific procedures for a mock scanner protocol, report on its use in the context of a multi-site study, and make suggestions for improving such protocols based on data acquired during study scanning. Specifically, a mock scanner compliance training protocol was used in a functional imaging study with a group of adolescents and adults with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and a matched sample of healthy children and adults. Head motion was measured during m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
89
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
89
0
Order By: Relevance
“…tones) by the child participants and restrict movement, the hallmark feature of ADHD. To date, however, assessing physiological processes in children with ADHD has proven problematic, as hyperactive pediatric samples are prone to producing motion artifact that may be related to the etiology of ADHD [21]. Historically, researchers were limited to simple listening tasks because of the capabilities of their physiological…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…tones) by the child participants and restrict movement, the hallmark feature of ADHD. To date, however, assessing physiological processes in children with ADHD has proven problematic, as hyperactive pediatric samples are prone to producing motion artifact that may be related to the etiology of ADHD [21]. Historically, researchers were limited to simple listening tasks because of the capabilities of their physiological…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many young children will not understand the degree to which they are moving and may forget that they were asked to remain still as the task progresses. Training in mock scanners prior to the fMRI session has consistently shown to improve the quality of data acquisition in pediatric groups (de Amorim e Silva et al, 2006;De Bie et al, 2010;Kotsoni et al, 2006;Poldrack et al, 2002) and pediatric clinical groups (Epstein et al, 2007). Training often integrates methods from the applied behavior analytic (ABA) methodology (Nordahl et al, 2016;Slifer et al, 1993).…”
Section: Pre-scan Trainingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26 The resting-state fMRI images were collected using a T2*-weighted gradient-echo EPI 27 to restrict head motion within the scanner. In-scanner head motion was calculated from the 31 resting-state fMRI images using the procedures described below.…”
Section: Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia For Children-present Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This indicates that most of the 25 participants were able to undergo the rest-state fMRI scanning without significant head motion. 26 We performed paired t-tests to compare the pairs of head motion parameters within each 27 group. For translation parameters, motion along the x-axis (left-to-right) was significantly less 28 than motion along the y-and z-axis for both groups (ADHD: t(66) > 8.40, p < 0.001, corrected 29 with Bonferroni correction; TDC: t(139) > 10.00, p < 0.001, corrected).…”
Section: Overview Of Motion Parameters Within Each Group 21mentioning
confidence: 99%