Assessment criteria for research misconduct: Taiwanese researchers’ perceptions

Chou, Chien; Pan, Sophia Jui-An; Hsueh, Mei-Lien

doi:10.1080/08989621.2022.2071155

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Research Integrity Culture1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2022

Publication Types

Select...

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent1

Authors

Journals

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In this regard, integrity guidelines should also inform concern at work and disciplinary policies. The assessment criteria of the severity of the misconduct, especially when an assessment leads to sanctions, should be transparent and objective to ensure fairness and justice [49 ▪▪ ,50 ▪ ]. Advances in technologies for information and communication should be applied.…”

Section: Research Integrity Culturementioning

confidence: 99%

Research integrity in clinical trials: innocent errors and spin versus scientific misconduct

Núñez-Núñez

Andrews

Fawzy

et al. 2022

Current Opinion in Obstetrics &Amp; Gynecology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose of reviewHigh-quality research underpins the best healthcare practice. This article focuses on analyzing the current literature to promote research integrity across clinical trials. Recent findingsRecent admissions of questionable practices by researchers have undermined practitioner and public confidence. There is limited evidence specifically for ethical and professional standards in clinical trials to guide researchers and institutions to embed integrity into research practice.

show abstract

Section: Research Integrity Culturementioning

confidence: 99%