2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-55994-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Aggregation Frameworks for Composite Indicators in Measuring Flood Vulnerability to Climate Change

Abstract: The IPCC Third Assessment Report presents a conceptual framework for vulnerability to climate change with the three attribute components of exposure, sensitivity, and coping. Since the vulnerability assessments have been conducted mainly by the composite indicators aggregated from the IPCC’s components, it is necessary to assess aggregation frameworks for constructing the composite indicators that have an influence on vulnerability assessment outcomes. This study therefore investigates the robustness of assess… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gerlitz et al 2017;Birkmann et al 2022). We restricted our analysis to hazards and NCP indicators because of the subjectivity of selecting and combining socio-economic factors that may not be relevant to local society needs (Beccari 2016;Il Choi 2019). Following the IPCC framework (Field and Barros 2014), we define a hazard as "the potential occurrence of a natural or human-induced physical event or trend that may cause loss of life, injury, or other health impacts, as well as damage and loss to property, infrastructure, livelihoods, service provision, ecosystems and environmental resources".…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gerlitz et al 2017;Birkmann et al 2022). We restricted our analysis to hazards and NCP indicators because of the subjectivity of selecting and combining socio-economic factors that may not be relevant to local society needs (Beccari 2016;Il Choi 2019). Following the IPCC framework (Field and Barros 2014), we define a hazard as "the potential occurrence of a natural or human-induced physical event or trend that may cause loss of life, injury, or other health impacts, as well as damage and loss to property, infrastructure, livelihoods, service provision, ecosystems and environmental resources".…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This multiplicative approach of integrated flood risk assessment was also adopted in many studies (e.g., Allen et al, 2016; Rakib et al, 2017) as it aggregates items of different scales and units. It was also suggested to use the multiplicative equation for the flood risk assessment due to CC, as it allows lesser compensation for low value indicators, whereas the additive approach provides a constant trade‐off among the components (Choi, 2019). Finally, hazard, exposure, vulnerability, and risk were classified into five categories: 0–20, 21–40, 41–60, 61–80, and 81–100 for very low, low, medium, high and very high, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The minmax transformation given to eq. ( 1) is a simple way to satisfy the commensurate measures of each variable [34].…”
Section: A Variable Selection and Data Formattingmentioning
confidence: 99%