2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16211
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of asymmetry at different intensities between conventional and paralympic powerlifting athletes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This could be explained by the lesser control that the non-dominant side would have in relation to the dominant side. In this direction, other studies showed asymmetry, mainly with higher intensities, with higher values for the non-dominant side, a fact observed in our study [ 23 , 32 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This could be explained by the lesser control that the non-dominant side would have in relation to the dominant side. In this direction, other studies showed asymmetry, mainly with higher intensities, with higher values for the non-dominant side, a fact observed in our study [ 23 , 32 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Monitoring training based on temperature is crucial, especially for athletes with physical disabilities who may experience overloading in affected body segments, impacting the performance of certain movements. The use of orthoses, prostheses, and wheelchairs may potentiate injuries and hinder the maintenance of body symmetry, a crucial aspect in competitions and training, particularly in Paralympic powerlifting [ 23 , 49 ]. Our data showed that Paralympic powerlifting training with high loads shows temperatures in a safe range (<1.6 °C) despite thermal asymmetries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…GPower 3.1.9.7 is utilized to evaluate the predicted sample size. A correlation analysis using a larger effect size of d = 0.7 required at least 11 participants at a significance level of α = 0.05 and a statistical power (1- β ) of 80 % [ 33 , 34 ]. The participants of this study include 12 male athletes from the taekwondo specialized training team (19.6 ± 2.0 years, 180 ± 7.3 cm, 70 ± 9.8 kg, and the average training history is 3.8 ± 2.0 years).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%