2016
DOI: 10.5114/fn.2016.60088
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of candidate immunohistochemical prognostic markers of meningioma recurrence

Abstract: A b s t r a c t Although tumour recurrence is an important and not infrequent event in meningiomas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis was carried out as previously described [44]. Briefly, the staining was performed on 4-μm-thick FFPE sections using the manufacturers’ protocols.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis was carried out as previously described [44]. Briefly, the staining was performed on 4-μm-thick FFPE sections using the manufacturers’ protocols.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The role of progesterone receptor (PR) has been studied in numerous papers. There is inverse relation between protein expression and tumour grade [25]. While the rate of cell division (mitosis) is increasing with higher grade, meningiomas in pregnancy are predominantly low grade (WHO I) with negligible mitotic activity.…”
Section: Pathophysiological and Morphological Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Histological grading in parallel with a panel of immunohistochemistry prognostic markers such as p53, poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 (PARP-1) and Ki-67 serve as independent prognostic indicators to predict recurrence and tumor progression. [17][18][19] Although xanthomatous meningioma is generally considered as a grade I (benign) tumor of the meninges with excellent clinical outcome, as in the present case, in extremely rare occurrences, xanthomatous change within atypical and anaplastic meningiomas have been previously reported. 20 Xanthomatous change in this subtype of meningioma was regarded as a metaplastic process and was categorized as one of the metaplastic meningiomas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…The clinical behavior of xanthomatous meningioma remains unclear due to the rarity of the entity. Histological grading in parallel with a panel of immunohistochemistry prognostic markers such as p53, poly(ADP‐ribose) polymerase‐1 (PARP‐1) and Ki‐67 serve as independent prognostic indicators to predict recurrence and tumor progression . Although xanthomatous meningioma is generally considered as a grade I (benign) tumor of the meninges with excellent clinical outcome, as in the present case, in extremely rare occurrences, xanthomatous change within atypical and anaplastic meningiomas have been previously reported…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%