2016
DOI: 10.5194/isprs-archives-xli-b8-1055-2016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Classification Accuracies of Sentinel-2 and Landsat-8 Data for Land Cover / Use Mapping

Abstract: ABSTRACT:This study aims to compare classification accuracies of land cover/use maps created from Sentinel-2 and Landsat-8 data. Istanbul metropolitan city of Turkey, with a population of around 14 million, having different landscape characteristics was selected as study area. Water, forest, agricultural areas, grasslands, transport network, urban, airport-industrial units and barren land-mine land cover/use classes adapted from CORINE nomenclature were used as main land cover/use classes to identify. To fulfi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
15
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This index is based upon the reflectance in a red and a near-infrared band. Driven by user needs, all Landsat and Sentinel 2 sensors include bands that allow NDVI derivation [43][44][45]. These band setups vary slightly across sensors and so there is not a single NDVI definition, which is relevant to multi-sensor monitoring.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This index is based upon the reflectance in a red and a near-infrared band. Driven by user needs, all Landsat and Sentinel 2 sensors include bands that allow NDVI derivation [43][44][45]. These band setups vary slightly across sensors and so there is not a single NDVI definition, which is relevant to multi-sensor monitoring.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the visual interpretation of classified maps derived from relatively coarser sensor of AWiFS and LISS-III. Similarly, interpretation of LULC maps generated from relatively higher spatial resolution sensors of Sentinel-2A and Landsat-8 OLI was performed [13].…”
Section: Fig 2 Flow Chart Of Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Repeated segmentation and testing of previews of each land cover/use class helped to improve the accuracy [67]. The same band set-shortwave infrared-1 (SWIR-1), near infrared (NIR), and red (bands 6, 5, 4, and bands 5, 4, 3 for Landsat-8 Operational Land Imager (OLI) and Landsat-5 Thematic Mapper (TM), respectively)-were used for maximum likelihood classification [68,69], in order to minimize the bias caused by using different band combinations. The LULC transition areas and their percentages for classified images from 2000, 2007, 2013, and 2018 were subsequently derived from the classification results using ENVI 5.3.…”
Section: Image Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%