1999
DOI: 10.1097/00132586-199904000-00057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Clinical Performance During Simulated Crises Using Both Technical and Behavioral Ratings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
79
0
3

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
79
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This line of research began with the work of Gaba et al (2001) who developed Anesthesia Crisis Resource Management (ACRM). ACRM was designed to help anesthesiologists effectively manage crises by working in multidisciplinary teams that include physicians, nurses, technicians, and other medical professionals (Howard et al 1992;Gaba et al 1998Gaba et al , 2001. ACRM uses patient simulators to provide training in specific technical and generic teamwork skills.…”
Section: Critical Components Of Teamworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This line of research began with the work of Gaba et al (2001) who developed Anesthesia Crisis Resource Management (ACRM). ACRM was designed to help anesthesiologists effectively manage crises by working in multidisciplinary teams that include physicians, nurses, technicians, and other medical professionals (Howard et al 1992;Gaba et al 1998Gaba et al , 2001. ACRM uses patient simulators to provide training in specific technical and generic teamwork skills.…”
Section: Critical Components Of Teamworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aim was to identify which command skills were considered to be essential for incident managers in the IMT. This type of skill set can be used to guide training, assessment and research, similar to those nontechnical skills systems used in aviation and medicine (Fletcher et al, 2003;Flin & Martin, 2001;Flin et al, 2003;Gaba et al, 1998). While recognising that members of the IMT work in a team environment, the focus for this case study was on the individual, as skill development begins at the individual level as opposed to the team or organisational level (Seamster & Kaempf, 2001).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order for scrub practitioners to use the prototype taxonomy, a rating scale was required. Studies of behavioural rating systems with 5-point rating scales found that the point at the 'outstanding' end of the scale was rarely used and carried an additional cost to consensus agreement [33]. Pilot testing of the system for anaesthetists (i.e.…”
Section: Rating Scalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The labels for the 4-point scale were 1 = poor, 2 = marginal, 3 = acceptable and 4 = good, since this avoided using terms such as 'substandard' or 'outstanding' as had been used in the Gaba et al [33] study. In addition to the 4-point scale, a rating option of 'not required' was included in the SPLINTS rating scale for occasions when a particular behaviour was not observed because it was not required by the scrub practitioner in that particular surgical case.…”
Section: Rating Scalementioning
confidence: 99%