1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0002-8703(98)70282-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of coronary artery disease in women by dobutamine stress echocardiography: Comparison with stress thallium-201 single-photon emission computed tomography and exercise electrocardiography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…70 On the basis of the aggregate data available in studies of nearly 1000 women with suspected CAD, stress echocardiography has demonstrated good diagnostic accuracy for detecting or excluding significant CAD, with a mean sensitivity of 81% (89% in women with multivessel disease), a specificity of 86%, and overall accuracy of 84%. 27,[33][34][35][37][38][39]67,69,[71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78] There appears to be no significant sex effect on the diagnostic accuracy of exercise echocardiography; thus, interpretation is sex neutral and equally accurate for women and men. Most stress echocardiography studies have not corrected for posttest referral bias, however; the few studies that have attempted to correct for posttest verification bias [33][34][35]71 demonstrate decreased sensitivity and increased specificity in identifying coronary artery disease as compared with unadjusted data.…”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…70 On the basis of the aggregate data available in studies of nearly 1000 women with suspected CAD, stress echocardiography has demonstrated good diagnostic accuracy for detecting or excluding significant CAD, with a mean sensitivity of 81% (89% in women with multivessel disease), a specificity of 86%, and overall accuracy of 84%. 27,[33][34][35][37][38][39]67,69,[71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78] There appears to be no significant sex effect on the diagnostic accuracy of exercise echocardiography; thus, interpretation is sex neutral and equally accurate for women and men. Most stress echocardiography studies have not corrected for posttest referral bias, however; the few studies that have attempted to correct for posttest verification bias [33][34][35]71 demonstrate decreased sensitivity and increased specificity in identifying coronary artery disease as compared with unadjusted data.…”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…38,39 The accuracy of perfusion imaging appears to be decreased in women with breast tissue attenuation, 39 and the smaller LV chamber size in women. 40 Pooled data from three direct comparisons [41][42][43] revealed a comparable sensitivity of the two techniques (71 vs 80%, Pϭns) (175 patients, Table 2) with a higher specificity of stress echocardiography for the detection of coronary artery disease (72 vs 89%, P<0.01). Comparative studies on adenosine stress imaging in patients with hypertension and women are not available.…”
Section: Detection Of Coronary Artery Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have reported on heterogeneous populations since patients with previous myocardial infarction or known CAD had been included. [14][15][16] To our knowledge, this is the first study in which DOBE has been compared directly with EX, DIPE, and SCINT on an homogeneous consecutive group of women with chest pain and no previous history of CAD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sensitivity and specificity obtained in this study are comparable with those obtained in previous studies performed on women. [14][15][16] Recently, the Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) group has reported on a striking overall sensitivity of 21% for DOBE in women without baseline wallmotion abnormalities. 17 This is in disagreement with other studies whose cohort is composed predominantly of men 11,12 or exclusively women.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation