1993
DOI: 10.1016/0378-5173(93)90026-c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of corticosteroid-induced skin blanching: evaluation of the Minolta Chromameter CR200

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…With fl ux measurements, an EF (equation 4) for LMO of 1.5 was found by Leopold and Lippold [25] . However, this factor is rather small and the enhancing effects observed with this vehicle could not be confi rmed in the present study because of the large standard deviations as a result of the interindividual differences in erythema response [26,27] . Compared to infi nite dose conditions, percutaneous drug penetration under fi nite dose conditions is characterized by an exponential curve profi le.…”
Section: Comparison Of Infi Nite and Finite Dose Conditionscontrasting
confidence: 39%
“…With fl ux measurements, an EF (equation 4) for LMO of 1.5 was found by Leopold and Lippold [25] . However, this factor is rather small and the enhancing effects observed with this vehicle could not be confi rmed in the present study because of the large standard deviations as a result of the interindividual differences in erythema response [26,27] . Compared to infi nite dose conditions, percutaneous drug penetration under fi nite dose conditions is characterized by an exponential curve profi le.…”
Section: Comparison Of Infi Nite and Finite Dose Conditionscontrasting
confidence: 39%
“…Many researchers have used methods based on reflectance measurements that either give ''erythema'' and ''pigmentation'' indices based on simple calculations 9-12 or calculate tristimulus values (L*a*b* scale͒ that have been adopted by the international committee of standards as the preferred method for color measurement. 11,[13][14][15][16][17][18][19] In the latter method L* and b*, as well as combinations of the two, have been used as pigmentation parameters and a* as the erythema parameter. Recent studies have showed that in both methods what is clinically perceived as erythema and pigmentation does not correlate linearly with the calculated indices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, the FDA recommends that the degree of blanching be assessed preferably using a chromameter and/or by visual assessment (5). Several reports have been published on the use of these methods (18)(19) and whilst the chromameter is currently perceived to be the method of choice (5), claims that the use of the visual assessment technique is more accurate have been reported (20)(21)(22)(23). The visual method involves subjective assessment of the intensity of blanching at the application site in comparison to surrounding untreated skin.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%