21Wild life is increasingly coming in contact with humans in many parts of the world. Human 22 perception of wild life may be an important factor in population management and 23 conservation practices in urban and semi-urban areas. Human attitude towards bird species 24 may vary from non-violent coexistence to a perception of birds as pests. Based on the data 25 collected from survey interviews, we studied the perceptions of local communities in 26 Rajasthan, India towards Indian Peafowl. Local communities in Rajasthan reported Indian 27 Peafowl as crop pest and this perception varied across seasons. The crop loss incurred due to 28 Indian Peafowl also varied across seasons according to the respondents. Despite reporting 29 peafowls as a crop pest, locals regularly offered grains for them as a traditional practice.
30Thus, at our study sites locals have mostly positive perception about Indian peafowl around 31 them.
32Food provisioning by local human population influenced diet composition and time-budget of 33 Indian Peafowls at food provision and non-provision sites. Sites at which food provisioning 34 was less or absent, peafowl spent more time in walking in search of food and more than half 35 of their diet consisted of natural food. In contrast, the sites at which plenty of grains were 36 available, time spent in walking was significantly less, while time spent in feeding was 37 significantly more; and over 70% of their diet consisted of carbohydrate and protein-rich 38 provisioned grains. Food provisioning changed the benefit: cost ratio (measured as time spent 39 in feeding to time spent in all other behaviours) between provision and non-provision sites. 40 Thus, food provisioning by humans can change feeding ecology of native Indian peafowl 41 populations, while the presence of peafowl in human dominated landscape changes how 42 humans interact with wild life around them.43 3 Key words: human-wildlife interactions, human perception, Indian Peafowl, food 44 provisioning, time-budget, benefit: cost ratio 45 46 Introduction: 47 65 provisioning in the form of crops, ornamental plants, livestock or waste food thrown in open 66 becomes easy and reliable source of food for wild life. Food provided by humans tends to be 67 4 calorie rich, easily digestible, available at predictable times and places. It is known that food 68 provisioning might change feeding habits, diet preference or diet composition of wild 69 mammals (Robb et al. 2008; Sih et al. 2011; Sengupta et al. 2015; Ayyappan et al. 2016; 70 Sengupta and Radhakrishna 2018). Reduced predatory pressure and regular availability of 71 nutrient rich food (in the form of crops) round the year are likely to provide greater resilience 72 of wild animals. It also allows them to live successfully close to agricultural landscape and 73 human habitation (Gilroy and Sutherland 2007; Sih et al. 2011; Ayyappan et al. 2016).
74There are many avian species like crows, sparrows, pigeons, cranes, egrets that 75 inhabit human-dominated landscapes or stay very close to ...